vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and GOLD FIELDS LTD (GFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.5× GOLD FIELDS LTD). GOLD FIELDS LTD runs the higher net margin — 24.8% vs 12.4%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 15.6%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($831.2M vs $423.6M).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Gold Fields Limited is one of the world's largest gold mining firms. Headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa, the company is listed on both the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The firm was formed in 1998 with the amalgamation of the gold assets of Gold Fields of South Africa Limited and Gencor Limited. The company traces its roots back to 1887, when Cecil Rhodes founded Gold Fields of South Africa Limited. As of 2019, Gold Fields was the world's e...
APH vs GFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 45.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | — |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 24.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 15.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 77.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $1.38 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 45.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $860.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $2.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 0.46× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $860.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.46× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $423.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 8.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 22.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 1.25× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $423.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 1.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
GFI
Segment breakdown not available.
