vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and L3Harris (LHX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $5.7B, roughly 1.3× L3Harris). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 8.9%, a 3.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 24.0%). Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($831.2M vs $-187.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 5.0%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company, defense contractor, and information technology services provider that produces products for command and control systems, wireless equipment, tactical radios, avionics and electronic systems, night vision equipment, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C3ISR) systems and products, ocean systems, instrumentation, navigation products, training devices and services, and both terrestrial/spaceborne antennas for use in the govern...
APH vs LHX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $5.7B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $512.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 175.6% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 11.4% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 8.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 24.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 32.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $2.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $21.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $5.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $5.3B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $462.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $453.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $400.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $366.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | 25.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 26.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 24.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 25.7% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 9.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $2.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $2.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $2.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $2.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $1.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $590.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $350.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $19.7M |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $41.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $482.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $615.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $539.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $547.0M |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $11.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $11.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | $19.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $19.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $19.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $19.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $19.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $18.8B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | $41.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $41.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $41.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $42.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $41.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $41.7B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | 0.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $-95.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $-187.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | -3.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | -0.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $546.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $640.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $780.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $754.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $427.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $552.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $702.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $657.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 12.4% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 2.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 2.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
LHX
| Space & Mission Systems | $3.0B | 52% |
| Communication & Spectrum Dominance | $1.9B | 32% |
| Missile Solutions | $990.0M | 17% |
