vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $5.4B, roughly 1.4× Cheniere Energy, Inc.). Cheniere Energy, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 42.8% vs 12.4%, a 30.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 20.3%). Cheniere Energy, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.3B vs $831.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 14.3%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Cheniere Energy, Inc. is an American liquefied natural gas (LNG) company headquartered in Houston, Texas.
APH vs LNG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $5.4B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $2.3B |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 70.8% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 42.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 20.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 135.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $10.51 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $353.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $977.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $893.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $880.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 70.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 56.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 44.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 50.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 42.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 24.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 36.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 28.0% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $10.51 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $4.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $7.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $4.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $3.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $22.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $47.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 2.84× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $22.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $22.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $22.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $22.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $22.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $22.6B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $6.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $47.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $45.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $44.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $43.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $43.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $43.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $42.3B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 2.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 3.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 3.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 4.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 4.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 5.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $1.3B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 24.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 13.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 0.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $2.5B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $831.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $738.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-193.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $875.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $613.0M |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 24.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 16.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 16.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 0.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 0.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 3.48× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 1.68× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 1.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
LNG
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $5.3B | 99% |
| Other | $103.0M | 2% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
