vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and MERCADOLIBRE INC (MELI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $6.1B, roughly 1.2× MERCADOLIBRE INC). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 9.1%, a 3.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 40.2%). MERCADOLIBRE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($4.8B vs $831.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 40.7%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
MercadoLibre, Inc., known as Mercado Livre in Brazil, literally meaning "free market" in both languages, is a company of Argentine origin and incorporated in Delaware in the United States that operates online marketplaces dedicated to e-commerce and online auctions. As of 2016, Mercado Libre had 174.2 million users in Latin America, making it the region's most popular e-commerce site by number of visitors.
APH vs MELI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $6.1B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $559.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 14.5% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 9.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 40.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | -12.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $11.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $421.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $523.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $494.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $639.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $397.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $531.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 61.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 61.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 64.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | 66.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 62.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 62.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 62.8% |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 19.3% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 9.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 8.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 14.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $11.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $8.32 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $10.31 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $9.74 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $12.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $7.83 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $10.48 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | $6.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | $6.7B |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | $42.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | 0.68× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $7.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $6.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $6.9B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $42.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $36.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $27.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $25.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $22.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $20.0B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | 0.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 0.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | 0.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | 0.67× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $5.2B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | $4.8B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | 77.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | 7.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 9.32× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | $10.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $759.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 50.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 54.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 59.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 45.1% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 9.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 7.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 5.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 2.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 4.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 4.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 3.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
MELI
| Commerce | $2.8B | 45% |
| Argentina Segment | $1.6B | 26% |
| Products | $1.2B | 20% |
| Other Countries Segment | $414.0M | 7% |
