vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and PG&E Corporation (PCG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.6B vs $6.9B, roughly 1.1× PG&E Corporation). PG&E Corporation runs the higher net margin — 12.9% vs 12.4%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 15.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 7.2%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is an American investor-owned utility (IOU). The company is headquartered at Kaiser Center, in Oakland, California. PG&E provides natural gas and electricity to 5.2 million households in the northern two-thirds of California, from Bakersfield and northern Santa Barbara County, almost to the Oregon and Nevada state lines.
APH vs PCG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $7.6B | $6.9B |
| Net Profit | $943.3M | $885.0M |
| Gross Margin | 36.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 24.0% | 21.4% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 58.4% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.8% | 39.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.72 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $5.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | $943.3M | $885.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $670.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $850.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $549.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | $634.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $674.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $579.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $524.0M |
| Q1 26 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 24.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 18.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | 10.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 8.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.72 | $0.39 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | $0.28 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.6B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $18.7B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $14.1B | — |
| Total Assets | $42.1B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.33× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $404.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $494.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $940.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $895.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $18.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | $57.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | $53.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $14.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $32.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $32.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $31.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | $30.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $30.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $26.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $26.3B |
| Q1 26 | $42.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $141.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $138.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $136.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | $135.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $133.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $132.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $130.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.33× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | 1.76× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $831.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $711.0M |
| Q1 26 | $831.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $-1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $-80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | $213.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $-896.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $526.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $-1.6B |
| Q1 26 | 10.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | -17.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | -34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | -26.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 46.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 46.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 52.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 44.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 38.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.19× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 2.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 3.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.93× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | 4.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 5.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
PCG
| Electric | $5.0B | 72% |
| Other | $1.9B | 28% |
