vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and Youxin Technology Ltd (YAAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $39.4K, roughly 163492.4× Youxin Technology Ltd). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 18.6% vs -324.8%, a 343.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
Youxin Technology Ltd is a China-based automotive digital service provider. It operates used car trading platforms, offers new car sales support, auto financing referrals, and after-sales resource matching for consumers and auto industry participants across mainland China, focusing on optimizing vehicle transaction efficiency.
APH vs YAAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $39.4K |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $-127.9K |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 67.9% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | -324.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 49.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $39.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-127.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $548.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 67.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | -324.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $-374.6K |
| Total Assets | $36.2B | $132.2K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $-374.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $132.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | $-88.6K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.4B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $-88.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions Segment | $3.5B | 54% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions Segment | $1.7B | 26% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $1.4B | 21% |
YAAS
Segment breakdown not available.
