vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Applied Digital Corp. (APLD) and Hippo Holdings Inc. (HIPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Applied Digital Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($126.6M vs $120.4M, roughly 1.1× Hippo Holdings Inc.). Hippo Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.0% vs -11.4%, a 16.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Applied Digital Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (98.2% vs 18.2%). Hippo Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $-567.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Applied Digital Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (70.9% CAGR vs 18.9%).
BAE Systems Digital Intelligence is an international defence and security technology firm owned by BAE Systems. They specialize in delivering digital solutions that enable rapid, data-driven decision-making. Their services, solutions and products span customers in Law Enforcement, National Security, Government Departments and Government Enterprises, Critical National Infrastructure, Telecommunications, the Military, and Space.
Hippo Valley Estate is a sugar estate found near the town of Chiredzi in Chiredzi District of southeastern Zimbabwe, on the Runde River near the border with Mozambique.
APLD vs HIPO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $126.6M | $120.4M |
| Net Profit | $-14.4M | $6.0M |
| Gross Margin | 20.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -24.5% | 5.6% |
| Net Margin | -11.4% | 5.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 98.2% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 89.6% | -86.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $126.6M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $64.2M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-33.3M | $117.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.9M | $110.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $63.9M | $101.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.7M | $95.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.7M | $89.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.3M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.4M | $6.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-16.9M | $98.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-52.5M | $1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-35.6M | $-47.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-138.7M | $44.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-64.5M | $-40.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-62.8M | $-35.7M |
| Q4 25 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -24.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -34.7% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -35.8% | -41.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -29.1% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.6% | -5.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -68.4% | -40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -128.8% | -38.7% |
| Q4 25 | -11.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -26.4% | 81.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 157.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -67.2% | -43.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -217.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.0% | -8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -147.5% | -45.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -145.0% | -42.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $3.77 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.31 | $0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | $-1.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.66 | $1.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.03 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.57 | $-1.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.52 | $-1.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $218.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $436.1M |
| Total Assets | $5.2B | $1.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $218.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.9M | $247.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.6M | $198.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.7M | $140.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.2M | $197.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.2M | $191.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $175.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.4M | $223.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $436.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $421.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $497.7M | $332.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $454.6M | $322.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $434.6M | $362.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $241.8M | $326.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.8M | $322.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $118.5M | $351.2M |
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $937.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $762.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $643.2M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.8M | $9.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-567.9M | $9.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -448.6% | 7.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 436.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.53× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.3B | $14.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-15.8M | $9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-82.0M | $16.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-52.3M | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.9M | $46.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-34.1M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.8M | $17.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-567.9M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-331.4M | $16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-191.4M | $24.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-251.6M | $-35.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-223.3M | $47.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-130.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-88.9M | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | -448.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -516.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 574.8% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -475.4% | -32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -349.6% | 46.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -215.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -203.5% | -11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.4% | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | 436.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 388.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -595.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 486.6% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 267.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 90.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 125.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 95.0% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.00× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APLD
| HPC Hosting Business | $85.0M | 67% |
| Data Center Hosting Business | $41.6M | 33% |
HIPO
Segment breakdown not available.
