vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (APLS) and Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Array Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($226.0M vs $199.9M, roughly 1.1× Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). On growth, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.9% vs -17.9%). Array Technologies, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.2M vs $-14.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Array Technologies, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (21.4% CAGR vs 7.7%).
Apellis Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing targeted therapies that modulate the complement system to address serious unmet medical needs. Its core products target ophthalmic conditions like geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration, as well as rare hematological and autoimmune disorders, with primary operations in the United States and European markets.
ATI Technologies Inc. was a Canadian semiconductor technology corporation based in Markham, Ontario, that specialized in the development of graphics processing units and chipsets. Founded in 1985, the company listed publicly in 1993 and was acquired by AMD in 2006. As a major fabless semiconductor company, ATI conducted research and development in-house and outsourced the manufacturing and assembly of its products. With the decline and eventual bankruptcy of 3dfx in 2000, ATI and its chief ri...
APLS vs ARRY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.9M | $226.0M |
| Net Profit | $-59.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.6% |
| Operating Margin | -25.6% | -65.5% |
| Net Margin | -29.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.9% | -17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -62.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.40 | $-1.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.9M | $226.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.6M | $393.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.5M | $362.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.8M | $302.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.5M | $275.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $231.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $255.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.3M | $153.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-59.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.7M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $43.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-92.2M | $16.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.4M | $-141.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.7M | $25.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-66.4M | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 25.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 35.9% |
| Q4 25 | -25.6% | -65.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.6% | 12.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.0% | 9.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.3% | -51.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.0% | -57.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.0% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.6% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.3% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.2% | -61.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.5% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.40 | $-1.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | $0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.46 | $-1.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $466.2M | $244.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $370.1M | $-206.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $466.2M | $244.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.2M | $221.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.0M | $377.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $358.4M | $348.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.3M | $363.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.9M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.1M | $282.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $325.9M | $287.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $370.1M | $-206.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.2M | $-46.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.3M | $-70.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.2M | $-97.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $228.5M | $-118.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.1M | $64.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.3M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.7M | $231.2M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $821.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.1M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $901.9M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $904.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.9M | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.2M | $43.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.3M | $36.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | 16.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $45.0M | $79.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.2M | $43.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.5M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $43.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.4M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $57.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | $44.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-133.0M | $47.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $36.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $21.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.4M | $-15.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $55.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-133.3M | $45.1M |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 16.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.0% | -5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -77.3% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 21.94× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APLS
| Syfovre | $155.2M | 78% |
| Empaveli Pegcetacoplan | $35.1M | 18% |
| Licensing And Other Revenue | $9.6M | 5% |
ARRY
| Array Legacy Operations Segment | $212.0M | 94% |
| STI Operations Segment | $14.0M | 6% |
