vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apollo Global Management (APO) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Apollo Global Management is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.9B vs $8.8B, roughly 1.1× Vale S.A.). Vale S.A. runs the higher net margin — 24.3% vs 6.9%, a 17.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Apollo Global Management posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (86.7% vs -11.3%).
Apollo Global Management, Inc. is an American asset management firm that primarily invests in alternative assets. As of 2025, the company had $840 billion of assets under management, including $392 billion invested in credit, including mezzanine capital, hedge funds, non-performing loans, and collateralized loan obligations, $99 billion invested in private equity, and $46.2 billion invested in real assets, which includes real estate and infrastructure. The company invests money on behalf of p...
Vale, formerly Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, is a Brazilian multinational corporation engaged in metals and mining and one of the largest logistics operators in Brazil. Vale is the largest producer of iron ore and nickel in the world. It also produces manganese, ferroalloys, copper, bauxite, potash, kaolin, and cobalt; as of 2014 the company operated nine hydroelectricity plants, and a large network of railroads, ships, and ports used to transport its products.
APO vs VALE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.9B | $8.8B |
| Net Profit | $684.0M | $2.1B |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.9% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 22.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.9% | 24.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 86.7% | -11.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -54.0% | -22.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.09 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $8.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $684.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $630.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $442.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $811.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $853.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.9% | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.2% | 27.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.09 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.78 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.99 | $0.50 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.68 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.41 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.29 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.35 | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.28 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $5.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.4B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.3B | $40.5B |
| Total Assets | $460.9B | $90.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.3B | $40.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.3B | $38.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8B | — |
| Q4 25 | $460.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $419.6B | $90.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $395.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $377.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $368.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $346.5B | $86.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $334.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.61× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.65× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.7B | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 6.83× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $303.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $70.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.05× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APO
| Retirement Services Segment | $8.5B | 86% |
| Asset Management1 | $681.0M | 7% |
| Principal Investing Segment | $624.0M | 6% |
| Management Service Incentive | $96.0M | 1% |
VALE
Segment breakdown not available.
