vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP (CATY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($348.6M vs $222.8M, roughly 1.6× CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP runs the higher net margin — 653.4% vs 4.7%, a 648.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (19.5% vs 2.1%). CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($363.7M vs $22.9M). Over the past eight quarters, CATHAY GENERAL BANCORP's revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -1.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Cathay General Bancorp is a U.S.-headquartered bank holding company that operates Cathay Bank, offering full-spectrum commercial and personal banking services. It primarily serves Asian American communities and small-to-medium enterprises across major U.S. states including California, New York and Texas, as well as select Asian markets, with products covering deposits, loans, and wealth management solutions.
APOG vs CATY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $348.6M | $222.8M |
| Net Profit | $16.5M | $90.5M |
| Gross Margin | 23.8% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.1% | 50.9% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 653.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.1% | 19.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -21.2% | 12.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.77 | $1.33 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $222.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $210.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $196.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $187.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $186.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $189.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $178.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $361.8M | $175.2M |
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $90.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $77.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $69.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $80.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $66.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.7M | $71.4M |
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 50.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 44.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 49.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 46.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.0% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 653.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 36.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 37.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 587.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 35.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 37.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.3% | 40.8% |
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $1.33 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $1.13 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $1.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.94 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.92 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.71 | $0.98 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $41.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $119.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $512.3M | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $24.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $37.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | $119.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.0M | $119.1M |
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $471.0M | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $24.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $24.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $23.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $884.1M | $23.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.13× | 0.04× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $29.3M | $368.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $22.9M | $363.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.6% | 163.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.9% | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.77× | 4.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $67.4M | $672.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $368.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $150.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $99.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $329.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $81.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $72.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $74.9M | $88.2M |
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $363.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $150.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $325.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $72.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $58.7M | $87.3M |
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 163.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 51.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 174.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 42.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 40.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.2% | 49.8% |
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.5% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 4.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.94× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 1.42× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 1.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.76× | 1.23× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Transferred At Point In Time | $163.0M | 47% |
| Architectural Services Segment | $105.2M | 30% |
| Performance Surfaces | $53.0M | 15% |
| UW Interco LLC | $27.9M | 8% |
CATY
Segment breakdown not available.