vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Dynatrace, Inc. (DT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Dynatrace, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($515.5M vs $351.4M, roughly 1.5× APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC.). Dynatrace, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 7.8% vs 4.7%, a 3.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Dynatrace, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.2% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Dynatrace, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.3% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Dynatrace, Inc. is an American multinational technology company that provides an AI-powered observability platform. Their software is used to monitor, analyze, and optimize application performance, software development, cyber security practices, IT infrastructure, and user experience.
APOG vs DT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $515.5M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $40.1M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | 81.4% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 14.1% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 7.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 18.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | -88.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $0.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $515.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $493.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $477.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $445.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $436.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $418.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $399.2M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $40.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $57.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $48.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $39.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $361.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $38.6M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 81.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | 81.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | 82.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | 80.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | 81.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | 81.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | 81.3% |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 10.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 82.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $0.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.19 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $4.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $2.1B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $33.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $27.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | 0.84× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $465.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $33.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $269.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $23.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $230.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $27.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $262.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $148.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $37.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | $227.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 54.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 33.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | 57.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 0.84× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 0.56× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 4.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 5.97× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
DT
| Subscription And Circulation | $493.4M | 96% |
| Services | $22.1M | 4% |
