vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $336.0M, roughly 1.0× Federal Realty Investment Trust). Federal Realty Investment Trust runs the higher net margin — 38.6% vs 4.7%, a 33.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Federal Realty Investment Trust posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Federal Realty Investment Trust's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Federal Realty Investment Trust is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers in the Northeastern United States, the Mid-Atlantic states, California, and South Florida.
APOG vs FRT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $336.0M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | $129.7M |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 53.8% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | 38.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 8.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | 103.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $1.49 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | $336.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $322.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $311.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $309.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $311.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $303.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $296.1M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | $129.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | $129.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $155.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $63.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | $65.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $61.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $112.0M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | 53.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 53.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 65.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 35.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 53.0% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 50.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 37.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $1.49 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $1.78 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $0.74 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $0.70 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $107.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $3.2B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $9.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | 1.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | $107.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $107.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $123.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $97.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $103.2M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $8.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $8.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $8.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $8.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $622.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $147.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $150.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $179.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $574.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $144.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $169.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 2.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 2.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | 8.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 2.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
FRT
Segment breakdown not available.
