vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. (APOG) and Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
APOGEE ENTERPRISES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($351.4M vs $253.4M, roughly 1.4× Palomar Holdings, Inc.). On growth, Palomar Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (62.7% vs 1.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Palomar Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (46.2% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Apogee Electronics is an American manufacturer of audio interfaces, analog-to-digital and digital-to-analog converters, USB & iOS microphones, and audio production software.
Palomar Holdings, Inc. is a specialty insurance holding company that primarily provides property insurance products for catastrophe-exposed residential and commercial assets. It mainly operates across the United States, focusing on core segments including earthquake, flood, and windstorm coverage to meet high-risk property protection demands of customers.
APOG vs PLMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $351.4M | $253.4M |
| Net Profit | $16.6M | — |
| Gross Margin | 22.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 28.7% |
| Net Margin | 4.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1.6% | 62.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 568.8% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.78 | $2.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $351.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $348.6M | $253.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $358.2M | $244.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $346.6M | $203.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $345.7M | $174.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $155.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $342.4M | $148.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $331.5M | $131.1M |
| Q1 26 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.6M | $51.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | $46.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5M | $42.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.0M | $25.7M |
| Q1 26 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.5% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 29.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.4% | 28.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | 25.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 25.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.6% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.8% | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 19.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.78 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.77 | $2.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.10 | $1.87 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $1.68 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.12 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.96 | $1.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.40 | $1.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.41 | $1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $39.5M | $106.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $232.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $511.8M | $942.7M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.45× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.3M | $106.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.5M | $111.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.8M | $81.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $119.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.9M | $80.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.0M | $86.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $47.8M |
| Q1 26 | $232.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $285.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $511.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $512.3M | $942.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $500.2M | $878.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $481.8M | $847.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $487.9M | $790.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $522.1M | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.4M | $703.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $480.0M | $532.6M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $917.1M | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $889.0M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $122.5M | $409.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $409.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 161.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.8% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.37× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $700.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $122.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.3M | $409.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.1M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.8M | $120.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.7M | $100.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $55.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.9M | $409.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.4M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.9M | $120.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.1M | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $22.0M | $260.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $100.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.6% | 161.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.6% | 34.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.8% | 59.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.5% | 49.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.4% | 167.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 7.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.77× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.41× | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.08× | 2.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 3.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.18× | 2.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APOG
| Architectural Services | $127.1M | 36% |
| Architectural Metals | $110.0M | 31% |
| Architectural Glass | $67.4M | 19% |
| Performance Surfaces | $54.3M | 15% |
PLMR
Segment breakdown not available.