vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aptiv (APTV) and Cintas (CTAS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aptiv is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $2.8B, roughly 1.8× Cintas). Cintas runs the higher net margin — 17.7% vs 2.7%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cintas posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 5.0%). Aptiv produced more free cash flow last quarter ($651.0M vs $425.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cintas's revenue compounded faster (7.9% CAGR vs 2.5%).
Aptiv PLC is an American automotive technology supplier with headquarters in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Aptiv grew out of the now-defunct American company, Delphi Automotive Systems, which itself was formerly a component of General Motors.
Cintas Corporation is an American corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, which provides a range of products and services to businesses including uniforms, mats, mops, cleaning and restroom supplies, first aid and safety products, fire extinguishers and testing, and safety courses. Cintas is a publicly held company traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CTAS and is a component of the S&P 500 Index.
APTV vs CTAS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $2.8B |
| Net Profit | $138.0M | $495.3M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 23.4% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 17.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.0% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.21 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $2.4B |
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $495.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-355.0M | $491.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $448.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $463.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.0M | $448.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.0M | $452.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.0M | $414.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.0M | $397.6M |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | 50.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 50.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | 49.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 49.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 50.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 23.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 17.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 17.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 16.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.21 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.63 | $1.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.80 | $1.08 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.47 | $4.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.79 | $3.84 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $200.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.5B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $4.5B |
| Total Assets | $23.4B | $10.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | 0.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $200.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $138.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $264.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $243.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $122.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $101.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $342.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $941.0M | $128.5M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1B | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | $23.4B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5B | $9.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $9.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5B | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6B | $9.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | 0.52× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 0.50× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $818.0M | $531.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $651.0M | $425.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.6% | 15.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.93× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $1.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $818.0M | $531.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $414.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $635.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $622.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $441.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $466.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $693.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.0M | $657.1M |
| Q4 25 | $651.0M | $425.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $312.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $521.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.0M | $522.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.0M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $373.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.0M | $591.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.0M | $550.1M |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | 15.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 20.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | 22.9% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.93× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | 0.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | 1.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APTV
| Electrical Distribution Systems | $2.3B | 45% |
| Engineered Components Group | $1.4B | 28% |
| Active Safety | $716.0M | 14% |
| User Experience And Other | $564.0M | 11% |
| Smart Vehicle Compute And Software | $154.0M | 3% |
CTAS
| Uniform Rental And Facility Services Segment | $2.2B | 77% |
| First Aid And Safety Services Segment | $342.2M | 12% |
| Fire Protection Services | $222.5M | 8% |
| Uniform Direct Sales | $79.8M | 3% |