vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aptiv (APTV) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aptiv is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2B vs $490.7M, roughly 10.5× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). Aptiv runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs 0.4%, a 2.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aptiv posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.0% vs 4.4%). Aptiv produced more free cash flow last quarter ($651.0M vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Aptiv's revenue compounded faster (2.5% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Aptiv PLC is an American automotive technology supplier with headquarters in Schaffhausen, Switzerland. Aptiv grew out of the now-defunct American company, Delphi Automotive Systems, which itself was formerly a component of General Motors.
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
APTV vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.2B | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $138.0M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.0% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.9B | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9B | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-355.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $393.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $268.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $363.0M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $938.0M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $218.0M | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.5% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.5% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.63 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.80 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.05 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.22 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.48 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.47 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.79 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.9B | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.5B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.2B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $23.4B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.81× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $941.0M | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $7.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.6B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.3B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.7B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $9.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.3B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.8B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.1B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $23.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.81× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.82× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.85× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.89× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.93× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.48× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.42× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $818.0M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $651.0M | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.6% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.93× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.5B | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $818.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $584.0M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $510.0M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $273.0M | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $499.0M | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $643.0M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $244.0M | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $651.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $361.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.0M | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $894.0M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $326.0M | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $417.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-21.0M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.2% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.4% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 5.93× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.96× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.37× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.69× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.12× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APTV
| Electrical Distribution Systems | $2.3B | 45% |
| Engineered Components Group | $1.4B | 28% |
| Active Safety | $716.0M | 14% |
| User Experience And Other | $564.0M | 11% |
| Smart Vehicle Compute And Software | $154.0M | 3% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
