vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amazon (AMZN) and OLYMPIC STEEL INC (ZEUS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amazon is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($213.4B vs $490.7M, roughly 434.9× OLYMPIC STEEL INC). Amazon runs the higher net margin — 9.9% vs 0.4%, a 9.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amazon posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.6% vs 4.4%). Amazon produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.9B vs $-12.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Amazon's revenue compounded faster (22.0% CAGR vs 0.1%).
Amazon.com, Inc. engages in the retail sale of consumer products and subscriptions through online and physical stores in North America and internationally. The company operates through three segments: North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS). Its products offered through its stores include merchandise and content purchased for resale; and products offered by third-party sellers The company also manufactures and sells electronic devices, including Kindle, Fire tablets, Fire ...
Olympic Steel, Inc. is a metals service center based in Cleveland, Ohio. The company processes and distributes carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel, aluminium alloy, tin plate, and metal-intensive branded products primarily in the United States. Metals processing and value added services include tempering, stretch leveling, cutting-to-length, slitting, edging, shearing, blanking, burning, forming, shot blasting, laser punching, plate rolling, fabricating, machi...
AMZN vs ZEUS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $213.4B | $490.7M |
| Net Profit | $21.2B | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | 48.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.9% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.6% | 4.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 5.9% | -21.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.95 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $213.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.2B | $490.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.7B | $496.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.7B | $492.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $187.8B | $418.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $158.9B | $470.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.0B | $526.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $143.3B | $526.6M |
| Q4 25 | $21.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2B | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.2B | $5.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.1B | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.0B | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.3B | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.5B | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.4B | $8.7M |
| Q4 25 | 48.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 50.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 50.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 49.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.0% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 7.3% | 1.7% |
| Q4 25 | $1.95 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.95 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.68 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.59 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.86 | $0.33 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.43 | $0.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.26 | $0.66 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.98 | $0.75 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $123.0B | $7.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $68.8B | $240.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $411.1B | $579.1M |
| Total Assets | $818.0B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.17× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $123.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.2B | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.2B | $14.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $94.6B | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.2B | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.1B | $11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.1B | $9.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $85.1B | $10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $68.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.1B | $240.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $56.1B | $233.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8B | $235.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.0B | $272.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.5B | $197.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7B | $209.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $66.9B | $196.8M |
| Q4 25 | $411.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $369.6B | $579.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $333.8B | $578.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $305.9B | $574.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $286.0B | $573.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $259.2B | $570.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $236.4B | $569.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $216.7B | $563.0M |
| Q4 25 | $818.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $727.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $682.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $643.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $624.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $584.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $554.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $531.0B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | 0.17× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.17× | 0.40× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.19× | 0.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.20× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.27× | 0.37× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $54.5B | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $14.9B | $-12.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.0% | -2.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.5% | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.57× | -2.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.7B | $41.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.5B | $-5.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.5B | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.0B | $49.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.6B | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.0B | $24.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.3B | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.0B | $-2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $14.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $430.0M | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $332.0M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.0B | $40.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.8B | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $15.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.7B | $-11.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.1B | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.2% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.2% | -2.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.8% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.5% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.2% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.68× | -2.50× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.79× | 2.96× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | 19.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.28× | 3.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.69× | 9.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | -0.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.82× | -0.30× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AMZN
| Products | $90.0B | 42% |
| Third Party Seller Services | $52.8B | 25% |
| Other | $49.9B | 23% |
| Subscription Services | $13.1B | 6% |
| Physical Stores | $5.9B | 3% |
| Other Services | $1.7B | 1% |
ZEUS
| Carbon Flat Products | $268.2M | 55% |
| Specialty Metals Flat Products | $140.9M | 29% |
| Tubular And Pipe Products | $81.6M | 17% |
