vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. (AQST) and SuperCom Ltd (SPCB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SuperCom Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($14.2M vs $13.0M, roughly 1.1× Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.). SuperCom Ltd runs the higher net margin — 37.5% vs -244.8%, a 282.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.7% vs -1.5%). SuperCom Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.6M vs $-8.6M).
Aquestive Therapeutics is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative treatments for central nervous system disorders. It leverages proprietary drug delivery technologies to create accessible, patient-friendly therapeutic options, serving healthcare providers and patients across North America and European markets, with core offerings addressing unmet needs in neurology and psychiatry.
Super.com is a technology company headquartered in San Francisco and co-founded by Hussein Fazal and Henry Shi. The company provides financial services, including reward programs and travel bookings.
AQST vs SPCB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13.0M | $14.2M |
| Net Profit | $-31.9M | $5.3M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | -221.6% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | -244.8% | 37.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.7% | -1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -86.8% | 79.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.26 | $1.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.1M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-31.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.5M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.7M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-12.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | 55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 64.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.4% | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 58.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 77.5% | 52.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 63.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -221.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -89.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -113.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -222.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -114.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -61.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.3% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -74.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | -244.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -120.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -135.4% | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -263.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -143.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -85.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -106.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.14 | $1.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $1.19 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $15.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $27.5M | $23.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-33.7M | $37.3M |
| Total Assets | $160.4M | $65.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.63× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $95.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $27.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.0M | $23.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.0M | $29.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-72.6M | $37.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-60.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-45.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-35.5M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $160.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $163.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $93.7M | $65.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $102.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $101.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $110.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $117.6M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $129.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.63× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-8.5M | $-2.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | $-3.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -65.7% | -25.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.7% | 10.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-53.0M | $-14.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-8.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $-950.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-7.0M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | -65.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -100.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -80.2% | -25.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -269.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -54.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -88.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -35.0% | -10.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -86.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 4.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -0.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
