vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arbe Robotics Ltd. (ARBE) and 60 DEGREES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. (SXTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arbe Robotics Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($458.0K vs $303.4K, roughly 1.5× 60 DEGREES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.). 60 DEGREES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. runs the higher net margin — -474.2% vs -2218.6%, a 1744.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. 60 DEGREES PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.8M vs $-9.0M).
Arbe Robotics Ltd. is an Israeli technology company that develops 4D imaging radar chipsets and perception solutions for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous vehicles. Headquartered in Tel Aviv, it is listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol ARBE.
Tonix Pharmaceuticals is a pharmaceutical company based in Chatham, New Jersey that focuses on repurposed drugs for central nervous system conditions and as of 2020 was also pursuing a vaccine for COVID-19 and a biodefense project.
ARBE vs SXTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $458.0K | $303.4K |
| Net Profit | $-10.2M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | -16.6% | 60.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2528.8% | -632.0% |
| Net Margin | -2218.6% | -474.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 29.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.09 | $-8.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $458.0K | $303.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $254.0K | $437.6K | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.0K | $100.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $163.6K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.6K | ||
| Q3 24 | $123.0K | $135.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $105.7K |
| Q4 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.6M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $430.5K |
| Q4 25 | -16.6% | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -95.7% | -22.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -67.5% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 55.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 51.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -220.3% | 17.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.1% |
| Q4 25 | -2528.8% | -632.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4531.9% | -531.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4189.8% | -1590.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1168.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -854.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10119.5% | -1566.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3351.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1270.4% |
| Q4 25 | -2218.6% | -474.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4344.5% | -529.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3707.3% | -1717.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -1147.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -846.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -10222.8% | -1596.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -3339.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 407.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.09 | $-8.26 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-1.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.56 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-51.96 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.19 | $-2.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.83 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $44.7M | $2.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $150.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $39.6M | $3.5M |
| Total Assets | $73.8M | $5.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.04× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $44.7M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $18.8M | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $150.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $150.0K |
| Q4 25 | $39.6M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.1M | $4.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.2M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.2M |
| Q4 25 | $73.8M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $75.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.5M | $7.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.02× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.0M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-9.0M | $-1.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1974.7% | -584.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.3% | 26.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-40.1M | $-7.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.8M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.0M | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-11.3M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-11.8M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.9M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -1974.7% | -584.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4448.8% | -484.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4319.3% | -1483.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -978.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -6408.9% | -1252.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 26.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 96.7% | 10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.65× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
