vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ardent Health, Inc. (ARDT) and Bilibili Inc. (BILI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ardent Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.3× Bilibili Inc.). Bilibili Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.0% vs 2.8%, a 3.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Goodlife Health Clubs is a chain of health clubs, with more than 80 locations in Australia.
Bilibili, nicknamed B Site, is a Chinese online video sharing website based in Shanghai where users can submit, view, and add overlaid commentary on videos.
ARDT vs BILI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $45.0M | $75.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 5.8% |
| Net Margin | 2.8% | 6.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 26.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $1.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $965.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $843.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $784.5M |
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $75.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.5M | $65.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $-1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-176.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.8M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-105.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 37.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 28.3% |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $1.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.51 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $709.6M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.2B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $5.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.84× | 0.62× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $709.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.4M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $540.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $495.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.1M | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $700.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $662.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $684.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $739.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $32.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.2B |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 0.62× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.88× | 0.65× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | 0.35× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | 0.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $223.4M | $263.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.97× | 3.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $223.4M | $263.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.4M | $283.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.5M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.8M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.7M | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $88.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | 3.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | 9.11× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.60× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | 195.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARDT
Segment breakdown not available.
BILI
| Value-added services (VAS) | $466.4M | 37% |
| Advertising | $435.0M | 34% |
| Mobile games | $220.3M | 17% |
| Other | $80.8M | 6% |
| IP derivatives and others | $68.2M | 5% |
