vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ardent Health, Inc. (ARDT) and CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.4× Ardent Health, Inc.). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 2.8%, a 2.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Goodlife Health Clubs is a chain of health clubs, with more than 80 locations in Australia.
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
ARDT vs CSTM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $2.2B |
| Net Profit | $45.0M | $112.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 7.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.8% | 5.1% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $112.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.5M | $88.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.0M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $37.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.8M | $76.0M |
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 5.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 3.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $0.62 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.25 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $0.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $709.6M | $120.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $952.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $5.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.84× | 2.00× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $709.6M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.4M | $122.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $540.6M | $133.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $495.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $952.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $845.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $780.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $745.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $739.9M | $796.0M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | 2.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.88× | 2.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | 2.53× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | 2.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $223.4M | $218.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $109.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 5.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.97× | 1.95× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $159.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $223.4M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.4M | $99.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.5M | $114.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.8M | $58.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $54.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.3% |
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | 1.95× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | 3.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.60× | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.82× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARDT
Segment breakdown not available.
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
