vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CONSTELLIUM SE (CSTM) and GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO (GPK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CONSTELLIUM SE is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.2B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.1× GRAPHIC PACKAGING HOLDING CO). CONSTELLIUM SE runs the higher net margin — 5.1% vs 3.4%, a 1.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Constellium SE is an American-Swiss, French-based global manufacturer of aluminium rolled products, extruded products, and structural parts based on a large variety of advanced alloys. Constellium's C-TEC research center has been credited for advancing technology in the field of advanced aluminium alloy. Constellium primarily serves the aerospace, automotive, and packaging sectors. Large clients include Mercedes-Benz, Audi, BMW, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Ford, Airbus, Boeing, and Bombardier.
Graphic Packaging International is a Fortune 500 corporation based in Atlanta, Georgia, United States. It designs and manufactures packaging solutions for commercial products. GPI manufactures paperboard and folding cartons for a wide range of popular consumer goods, particularly beverages and packaged food. The company operates paperboard mills in Kalamazoo, Michigan; Macon, Georgia; Middletown, Ohio; Prosperity, South Carolina; Texarkana, Texas; and West Monroe, Louisiana, that use recycled...
CSTM vs GPK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.2B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $112.0M | $71.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 14.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.5% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 5.1% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.79 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | $112.0M | $71.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.0M | $142.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.0M | $104.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.0M | $127.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $165.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.0M | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.8% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.4% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.79 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.62 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.34 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.26 | $0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.62 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $120.0M | $261.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.9B | $5.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $952.0M | $3.3B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $11.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.00× | 1.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $120.0M | $261.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $122.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $133.0M | $120.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $118.0M | $129.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $157.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $126.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $136.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $5.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.9B |
| Q4 25 | $952.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $845.0M | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $745.0M | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $796.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.9B |
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $11.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $11.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.3B |
| Q4 25 | 2.00× | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.34× | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.53× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.56× | 1.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.73× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $218.0M | $521.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $109.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.95× | 7.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $159.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $218.0M | $521.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $114.0M | $267.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.0M | $-174.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $489.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $187.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $161.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $109.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $54.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.95× | 7.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.13× | 1.60× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.17× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | -1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.54× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.82× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CSTM
| Packaging Rolled Products | $1.0B | 46% |
| Automotive Rolled Products | $318.0M | 14% |
| Aerospace Rolled Products | $270.0M | 12% |
| Transportation Industry Defense And Other Rolled Products | $232.0M | 11% |
| Automotive Extruded Products | $220.0M | 10% |
| Other Extruded Products | $132.0M | 6% |
| Specialty And Other Thin Rolled Products | $22.0M | 1% |
GPK
| Americas Paperboard Packaging | $1.4B | 68% |
| Other | $667.0M | 32% |
