vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ardent Health, Inc. (ARDT) and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Ardent Health, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.6B vs $1.2B, roughly 1.4× Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc.). Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.4% vs 2.8%, a 0.6% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Goodlife Health Clubs is a chain of health clubs, with more than 80 locations in Australia.
Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc., branded as Floor & Decor, is a multi-channel American specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories that was founded in 2000 and headquartered in Smyrna, Georgia, United States.
ARDT vs FND — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.6B | $1.2B |
| Net Profit | $45.0M | $39.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 2.8% | 3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -0.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -18.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $45.0M | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.5M | $57.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $73.0M | $63.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $48.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | $51.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.8M | $56.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.9% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.8% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.5% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 5.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.17 | $0.53 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.58 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.45 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.19 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.34 | $0.52 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $709.6M | $293.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $2.5B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $5.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.84× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $293.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $709.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $609.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $540.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $495.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $563.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $739.9M | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.2B | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.0B | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.8B | $4.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.6B | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.93× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $223.4M | $109.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.97× | 2.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $109.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.4M | $124.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $154.4M | $102.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $117.5M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-24.8M | $71.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $89.7M | $160.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $194.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $45.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-10.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $36.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.75× | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.97× | 3.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.61× | 1.33× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.60× | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.41× | 3.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
