vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and KILROY REALTY CORP (KRC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $272.2M, roughly 1.3× KILROY REALTY CORP). KILROY REALTY CORP runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs 4.1%, a 2.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Arhaus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.1% vs -5.0%). KILROY REALTY CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($450.3M vs $-8.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Arhaus, Inc.ARHSEarnings & Financial Report
Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.
Kilroy Realty Corp is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust that develops, owns, and operates premium office, life science, and mixed-use properties primarily across high-growth West Coast markets including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, and San Diego. It serves tenants across the technology, life sciences, media, and creative sectors, with a core focus on delivering sustainable, future-ready workspaces tailored to modern business needs.
ARHS vs KRC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $364.8M | $272.2M |
| Net Profit | $15.1M | $17.1M |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 4.1% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.1% | -5.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -29.1% | -73.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.11 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $364.8M | $272.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $344.6M | $279.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $358.4M | $289.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $311.4M | $270.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $347.0M | $286.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $319.1M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.8M | $280.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $295.2M | $278.6M |
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $17.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2M | $162.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $79.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $43.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.3M | $65.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.9M | $57.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $54.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.1M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | 38.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 41.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 39.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 4.1% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.8% | 27.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.1% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 20.0% |
| Q4 25 | $0.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.09 | $1.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.25 | $0.57 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.03 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.15 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.07 | $0.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.16 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.11 | $0.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $253.4M | $179.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $418.2M | $5.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $10.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $253.4M | $179.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $262.2M | $372.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.8M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $214.4M | $146.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $197.5M | $165.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | $625.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $174.2M | $835.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $233.2M | $855.0M |
| Q4 25 | $418.2M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $400.4M | $5.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $385.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $348.8M | $5.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.7M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $320.6M | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $309.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $285.6M | $5.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $10.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $10.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $11.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.3M | $566.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.8M | $450.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2.4% | 165.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.0% | 42.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.62× | 33.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $59.0M | $833.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $9.3M | $566.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $46.1M | $176.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.9M | $143.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.5M | $136.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | $541.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.1M | $176.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.5M | $88.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $36.8M | $167.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.8M | $450.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $148.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $115.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.0M | $440.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $147.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $69.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.9M | $151.9M |
| Q4 25 | -2.4% | 165.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.1% | 53.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 40.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.1% | 42.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 153.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | 24.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | 54.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 42.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.9% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.4% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.3% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.8% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | 33.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.77× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.00× | 1.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.53× | 3.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.49× | 8.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.14× | 1.63× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.44× | 3.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARHS
| Sales Channel Retail | $305.7M | 84% |
| Sales Channel E Commerce | $59.2M | 16% |
KRC
Segment breakdown not available.