vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) and Enpro Inc. (NPO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Arhaus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($364.8M vs $295.4M, roughly 1.2× Enpro Inc.). Arhaus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 4.1% vs -10.8%, a 15.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Enpro Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.3% vs 5.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Arhaus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.2% CAGR vs 7.1%).

Arhaus, Inc. is an upscale American home furnishings company headquartered in Boston Heights, Ohio. Founded in 1986 with a focus on sustainability and artisanship in product quality, Arhaus provides a diversified assortment of specialty goods and services addressing omnichannel direct-to-consumer and business-to-business residential and commercial operations.

Enpro is a US-based industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products and materials for technology-intensive sectors. The company serves industries such as semiconductors, aerospace, power generation, heavy-duty trucking, agricultural machinery, chemical processing, pulp and paper, and life sciences from 61 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, worldwide. It is organized under three segments: Sealing Technologies, Advanced Surface Technologies, and Engin...

ARHS vs NPO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ARHS
ARHS
1.2× larger
ARHS
$364.8M
$295.4M
NPO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
NPO
NPO
+9.2% gap
NPO
14.3%
5.1%
ARHS
Higher net margin
ARHS
ARHS
15.0% more per $
ARHS
4.1%
-10.8%
NPO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ARHS
ARHS
Annualised
ARHS
11.2%
7.1%
NPO

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Revenue
$364.8M
$295.4M
Net Profit
$15.1M
$-32.0M
Gross Margin
38.1%
42.1%
Operating Margin
5.6%
11.2%
Net Margin
4.1%
-10.8%
Revenue YoY
5.1%
14.3%
Net Profit YoY
-29.1%
-330.2%
EPS (diluted)
$0.11
$-1.50

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$364.8M
$295.4M
Q3 25
$344.6M
$286.6M
Q2 25
$358.4M
$288.1M
Q1 25
$311.4M
$273.2M
Q4 24
$347.0M
$258.4M
Q3 24
$319.1M
$260.9M
Q2 24
$309.8M
$271.9M
Q1 24
$295.2M
$257.5M
Net Profit
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$15.1M
$-32.0M
Q3 25
$12.2M
$21.6M
Q2 25
$35.1M
$26.4M
Q1 25
$4.9M
$24.5M
Q4 24
$21.3M
$13.9M
Q3 24
$9.9M
$19.8M
Q2 24
$22.2M
$26.7M
Q1 24
$15.1M
$12.5M
Gross Margin
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
38.1%
42.1%
Q3 25
38.7%
41.9%
Q2 25
41.4%
43.3%
Q1 25
37.1%
43.3%
Q4 24
40.0%
42.3%
Q3 24
38.6%
42.3%
Q2 24
40.1%
43.8%
Q1 24
39.0%
41.2%
Operating Margin
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
5.6%
11.2%
Q3 25
4.8%
14.3%
Q2 25
13.0%
15.9%
Q1 25
1.7%
15.3%
Q4 24
8.2%
12.5%
Q3 24
3.3%
13.1%
Q2 24
9.5%
17.7%
Q1 24
6.2%
10.9%
Net Margin
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
4.1%
-10.8%
Q3 25
3.5%
7.5%
Q2 25
9.8%
9.2%
Q1 25
1.6%
9.0%
Q4 24
6.1%
5.4%
Q3 24
3.1%
7.6%
Q2 24
7.2%
9.8%
Q1 24
5.1%
4.9%
EPS (diluted)
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$0.11
$-1.50
Q3 25
$0.09
$1.01
Q2 25
$0.25
$1.25
Q1 25
$0.03
$1.15
Q4 24
$0.15
$0.65
Q3 24
$0.07
$0.94
Q2 24
$0.16
$1.27
Q1 24
$0.11
$0.59

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$253.4M
$114.7M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$655.3M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$418.2M
$1.5B
Total Assets
$1.4B
$2.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.42×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$253.4M
$114.7M
Q3 25
$262.2M
$132.9M
Q2 25
$234.8M
$107.1M
Q1 25
$214.4M
$240.3M
Q4 24
$197.5M
$236.3M
Q3 24
$177.7M
$206.9M
Q2 24
$174.2M
$175.9M
Q1 24
$233.2M
$163.9M
Total Debt
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$655.3M
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$640.1M
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$644.9M
Stockholders' Equity
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$418.2M
$1.5B
Q3 25
$400.4M
$1.5B
Q2 25
$385.6M
$1.5B
Q1 25
$348.8M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$343.7M
$1.4B
Q3 24
$320.6M
$1.5B
Q2 24
$309.3M
$1.4B
Q1 24
$285.6M
$1.4B
Total Assets
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$1.4B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$2.4B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$2.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
$2.5B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$2.5B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$2.5B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$2.5B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$2.5B
Debt / Equity
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
0.42×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.45×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.46×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$9.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.8M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-2.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.0%
4.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.62×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$59.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$9.3M
Q3 25
$46.1M
$65.3M
Q2 25
$34.9M
$52.2M
Q1 25
$46.5M
$21.0M
Q4 24
$31.7M
$59.4M
Q3 24
$31.1M
$54.0M
Q2 24
$47.5M
$43.2M
Q1 24
$36.8M
$6.3M
Free Cash Flow
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
$-8.8M
Q3 25
$28.0M
$53.4M
Q2 25
$20.9M
$42.3M
Q1 25
$18.9M
$13.0M
Q4 24
$13.0M
$49.1M
Q3 24
$4.6M
$48.3M
Q2 24
$11.3M
$38.3M
Q1 24
$10.9M
$-1.9M
FCF Margin
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
-2.4%
Q3 25
8.1%
18.6%
Q2 25
5.8%
14.7%
Q1 25
6.1%
4.8%
Q4 24
3.7%
19.0%
Q3 24
1.4%
18.5%
Q2 24
3.6%
14.1%
Q1 24
3.7%
-0.7%
Capex Intensity
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
5.0%
4.1%
Q3 25
5.3%
4.2%
Q2 25
3.9%
3.4%
Q1 25
8.9%
2.9%
Q4 24
5.4%
4.0%
Q3 24
8.3%
2.2%
Q2 24
11.7%
1.8%
Q1 24
8.8%
3.2%
Cash Conversion
ARHS
ARHS
NPO
NPO
Q4 25
0.62×
Q3 25
3.77×
3.02×
Q2 25
1.00×
1.98×
Q1 25
9.53×
0.86×
Q4 24
1.49×
4.27×
Q3 24
3.14×
2.73×
Q2 24
2.14×
1.62×
Q1 24
2.44×
0.50×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ARHS
ARHS

Sales Channel Retail$305.7M84%
Sales Channel E Commerce$59.2M16%

NPO
NPO

Sealing Technologies Segment$187.0M63%
General Industrial$71.3M24%
Power Generation$19.9M7%
Oiland Gas Market$15.0M5%
Semiconductors$2.2M1%

Related Comparisons