vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP) and LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($516.0M vs $319.7M, roughly 1.6× LendingTree, Inc.). LendingTree, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 45.2% vs 2.1%, a 43.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LendingTree, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.2% vs -3.6%). LendingTree, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.7M vs $13.3M). Over the past eight quarters, LendingTree, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.0% CAGR vs -6.7%).
Alliance Resource Partners LP is a leading North American natural resource enterprise primarily engaged in the production and marketing of coal for utility and industrial customers. It also operates complementary business segments including mineral royalty management, oil and gas extraction, and logistics support services.
LendingTree, Inc. is an online lending marketplace, founded in 1996 and headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. The business platform allows potential borrowers to connect with multiple loan operators to find optimal terms for loans, credit cards, deposit accounts, insurance, etc. LendingTree allows borrowers to shop and compare competitive rates and terms across an array of financial products. Other additional services include financing tools, comparative loan searches and borrowing info...
ARLP vs TREE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $516.0M | $319.7M |
| Net Profit | $10.7M | $144.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 29.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Net Margin | 2.1% | 45.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.6% | 22.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 1827.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $10.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $516.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $535.5M | $319.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $571.4M | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $547.5M | $250.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $540.5M | $239.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $590.1M | $261.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.6M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $593.4M | $210.1M |
| Q1 26 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $82.7M | $144.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.1M | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.4M | $8.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.3M | $-58.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.2M | $7.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% |
| Q1 26 | 4.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.4% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.4% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.9% | 3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | -5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $10.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.65 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.92 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.58 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $28.9M | $81.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $387.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $286.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $855.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $28.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.2M | $81.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $94.5M | $68.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.0M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.3M | $126.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $106.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $195.4M | $96.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $203.7M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $387.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $388.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $385.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $387.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $344.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $346.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $467.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $286.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $132.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $118.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $103.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $94.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $145.8M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $855.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $759.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $835.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9B | $777.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $767.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $787.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $802.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.93× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.21× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $73.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $13.3M | $60.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 2.6% | 19.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 18.5% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $342.2M | $107.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $143.9M | $73.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $209.9M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $151.7M | $28.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $145.7M | $-210.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $168.4M | $62.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $209.3M | $45.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $215.8M | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | $13.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.1M | $60.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $25.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.7M | $25.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.9M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $99.0M | $42.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.3M | $-7.7M |
| Q1 26 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.9% | -1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.8% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.1% | 16.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | -3.7% |
| Q1 26 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.4% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.8% | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.1% | 1.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.74× | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.21× | 2.84× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.55× | 3.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.97× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.31× | 8.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.43× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.15× | -0.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARLP
| Coal sales | $443.3M | 86% |
| Oil & gas royalties | $41.3M | 8% |
| Other revenues | $22.8M | 4% |
| Transportation revenues | $8.6M | 2% |
| Tons Produced | $8.0M | 2% |
| Mineral Interest Volumes (BOE) | $1.0M | 0% |
TREE
| Insurance Segment | $214.6M | 67% |
| Other Consumer | $39.5M | 12% |
| Home Segment | $36.2M | 11% |
| Personal Loans | $29.1M | 9% |
