vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ARROW FINANCIAL CORP (AROW) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
IonQ, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($61.9M vs $35.0M, roughly 1.8× ARROW FINANCIAL CORP). IonQ, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 1217.8% vs 24.6%, a 1193.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, IonQ, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (428.5% vs 7.1%). ARROW FINANCIAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.5M vs $-83.3M).
Flagstar Bank, N.A. (FLG), is an American regional financial services holding company headquartered in Hicksville, New York. In 2023, the bank operated 395 branches However, they rebranded all of these under the Flagstar name on February 21, 2024.
IonQ, Inc. is an American quantum computing hardware and software company headquartered in College Park, Maryland. The company develops general-purpose trapped ion quantum computers and accompanying software to generate, optimize, and execute quantum circuits.
AROW vs IONQ — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $35.0M | $61.9M |
| Net Profit | $8.6M | $753.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -369.4% |
| Net Margin | 24.6% | 1217.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.1% | 428.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 42.3% | 473.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.52 | $2.60 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $34.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $25.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $753.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-176.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-202.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-52.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.6M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $7.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -369.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -423.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -776.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -661.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -428.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -430.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1217.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2646.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -854.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1725.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -423.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.6% | -330.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.3% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 30.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.95 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.52 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.45 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0.46 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $383.0M | $3.8B |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | $6.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $546.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $340.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $365.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $369.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $6.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $383.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $435.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $383.0M | $463.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $378.0M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $379.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $508.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $497.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $517.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $4.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.02× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $9.1M | $-74.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.5M | $-83.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 21.5% | -134.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | 14.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.06× | -0.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $9.6M | $-307.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-123.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-52.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-39.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-19.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.1M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-16.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-83.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-127.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-43.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-23.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.5M | $-34.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.2M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $-16.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -134.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -319.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -259.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -367.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -185.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | -299.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -66.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 30.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.5% | 65.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.35× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | -2.11× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AROW
Segment breakdown not available.
IONQ
| Other | $31.2M | 50% |
| Platform Consulting And Support Services | $30.7M | 50% |
