vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and HARTE HANKS INC (HHS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.4M vs $39.9M, roughly 1.3× HARTE HANKS INC). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs 5.5%, a 414.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs -15.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs -6.4%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
Harte Hanks is a global marketing services company headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts. Harte Hanks services include analytics, strategy, marketing technology, creative services, digital marketing, customer care, direct mail, logistics, and fulfillment.
ARR vs HHS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $39.9M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $2.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -0.3% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | -15.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $0.30 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | $39.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $39.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $38.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $41.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $47.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $45.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $45.4M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $-335.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $-392.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $142.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $-27.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-171.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.8% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | -5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | -0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | -0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | -61.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | $0.30 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $-3.84 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $5.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $20.5M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $91.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | $5.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $19.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $21.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $21.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $20.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $20.0M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | $91.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $95.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $100.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $101.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $108.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $109.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $113.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $737.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-686.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | 0.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-4.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $737.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $-818.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-686.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-923.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $926.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-6.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -10.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 0.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.76× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARR
Segment breakdown not available.
HHS
| Fulfillment And Logistics Services | $17.3M | 43% |
| Customer Care | $13.7M | 34% |
| Other | $8.9M | 22% |
