vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Armour Residential REIT, Inc. (ARR) and SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($50.4M vs $39.4M, roughly 1.3× SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC). Armour Residential REIT, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 420.2% vs 54.9%, a 365.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Armour Residential REIT, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (297.9% vs 1.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Armour Residential REIT, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (108.0% CAGR vs 14.1%).
Armour Residential REIT, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that primarily invests in agency residential mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored entities. It focuses on generating consistent long-term net income for shareholders via strategic asset management and active interest rate risk mitigation.
SandRidge Energy, Inc. is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration in the Mid-Continent region of the United States. It is organized in Delaware and headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
ARR vs SD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $50.4M | $39.4M |
| Net Profit | $211.7M | $21.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 38.5% |
| Net Margin | 420.2% | 54.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 297.9% | 1.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 555.9% | 23.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.43 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $50.4M | $39.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.5M | $39.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.3M | $42.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.7M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | $211.7M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $159.3M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-75.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.3M | $13.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-46.4M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-48.4M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 53.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 28.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | 420.2% | 54.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 413.5% | 40.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -228.4% | 56.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.2% | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -366.8% | 45.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -693.8% | 33.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 36.7% |
| Q4 25 | $2.43 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.49 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $0.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.32 | $0.35 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.91 | $0.46 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.05 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $63.3M | $111.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $510.9M |
| Total Assets | $21.0B | $644.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.3M | $111.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $44.2M | $101.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $141.2M | $102.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $99.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $98.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $92.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $126.6M | $209.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $207.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $510.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $492.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $480.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $464.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $460.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $446.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $424.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $419.7M |
| Q4 25 | $21.0B | $644.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.4B | $619.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.2B | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.5B | $588.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5B | $581.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $565.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.1B | $529.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $527.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $124.2M | $31.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 36.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 43.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.59× | 1.46× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $41.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $124.2M | $31.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-37.8M | $25.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $101.5M | $20.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.5M | $26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.1M | $11.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $15.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 32.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.7% |
| Q4 25 | 0.59× | 1.46× | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.24× | 1.58× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.71× | 1.56× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ARR
Segment breakdown not available.
SD
| Oil Reserves | $19.0M | 48% |
| Natural Gas Reserves | $11.6M | 30% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $8.7M | 22% |
