vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and EnerSys (ENS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Amer Sports, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $919.1M, roughly 1.1× EnerSys). EnerSys runs the higher net margin — 9.8% vs 1.8%, a 8.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. EnerSys produced more free cash flow last quarter ($171.3M vs $92.2M).

Amer Sports, Inc. is a Finnish multinational sporting equipment division based in Helsinki, Finland. Established in 1950 as an industrial conglomerate with interests as diverse as tobacco trading, ship owning and publishing, Amer has gradually evolved into a multinational firm devoted to the production and marketing of sporting goods. The company employs over 9,700 people. Since 2018, Amer has been a subsidiary of Chinese retail conglomerate Anta Sports.

EnerSys is a stored energy systems and technology provider for industrial applications. The company manufactures reserve-power and motive-power batteries, battery chargers, power equipment, battery accessories and outdoor equipment enclosures.

AS vs ENS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
AS
AS
1.1× larger
AS
$1.1B
$919.1M
ENS
Higher net margin
ENS
ENS
8.0% more per $
ENS
9.8%
1.8%
AS
More free cash flow
ENS
ENS
$79.1M more FCF
ENS
$171.3M
$92.2M
AS

Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2026

Metric
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Revenue
$1.1B
$919.1M
Net Profit
$19.0M
$90.4M
Gross Margin
52.8%
30.1%
Operating Margin
12.4%
13.5%
Net Margin
1.8%
9.8%
Revenue YoY
1.4%
Net Profit YoY
-21.3%
EPS (diluted)
$0.05
$2.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$919.1M
Q3 25
$951.3M
Q2 25
$893.0M
Q1 25
$974.8M
Q4 24
$906.2M
Q3 24
$883.7M
Q2 24
$852.9M
Q1 24
$1.1B
$910.7M
Net Profit
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$90.4M
Q3 25
$68.4M
Q2 25
$57.5M
Q1 25
$96.5M
Q4 24
$114.8M
Q3 24
$82.3M
Q2 24
$70.1M
Q1 24
$19.0M
$60.9M
Gross Margin
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
30.1%
Q3 25
29.1%
Q2 25
28.4%
Q1 25
31.2%
Q4 24
32.9%
Q3 24
28.5%
Q2 24
27.9%
Q1 24
52.8%
27.9%
Operating Margin
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
13.5%
Q3 25
9.7%
Q2 25
9.7%
Q1 25
13.5%
Q4 24
15.7%
Q3 24
11.2%
Q2 24
10.7%
Q1 24
12.4%
8.9%
Net Margin
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
9.8%
Q3 25
7.2%
Q2 25
6.4%
Q1 25
9.9%
Q4 24
12.7%
Q3 24
9.3%
Q2 24
8.2%
Q1 24
1.8%
6.7%
EPS (diluted)
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$2.40
Q3 25
$1.80
Q2 25
$1.46
Q1 25
$2.39
Q4 24
$2.88
Q3 24
$2.01
Q2 24
$1.71
Q1 24
$0.05
$1.48

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$450.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9B
Total Assets
$4.0B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$450.1M
Q3 25
$388.6M
Q2 25
$346.7M
Q1 25
$343.1M
Q4 24
$463.2M
Q3 24
$407.9M
Q2 24
$344.1M
Q1 24
$333.3M
Total Debt
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
$1.1B
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$802.0M
Stockholders' Equity
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$1.9B
Q3 25
$1.9B
Q2 25
$1.9B
Q1 25
$1.9B
Q4 24
$1.8B
Q3 24
$1.8B
Q2 24
$1.8B
Q1 24
$1.8B
Total Assets
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$4.0B
Q3 25
$4.1B
Q2 25
$4.1B
Q1 25
$4.0B
Q4 24
$4.0B
Q3 24
$4.0B
Q2 24
$3.6B
Q1 24
$3.5B
Debt / Equity
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
0.57×
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.46×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$114.3M
$184.6M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$92.2M
$171.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
8.8%
18.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.1%
1.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.02×
2.04×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$441.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$184.6M
Q3 25
$218.0M
Q2 25
$968.0K
Q1 25
$135.2M
Q4 24
$81.1M
Q3 24
$33.6M
Q2 24
$10.4M
Q1 24
$114.3M
Free Cash Flow
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
$171.3M
Q3 25
$197.1M
Q2 25
$-32.1M
Q1 25
$104.9M
Q4 24
$56.8M
Q3 24
$3.3M
Q2 24
$-25.7M
Q1 24
$92.2M
FCF Margin
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
18.6%
Q3 25
20.7%
Q2 25
-3.6%
Q1 25
10.8%
Q4 24
6.3%
Q3 24
0.4%
Q2 24
-3.0%
Q1 24
8.8%
Capex Intensity
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
1.4%
Q3 25
2.2%
Q2 25
3.7%
Q1 25
3.1%
Q4 24
2.7%
Q3 24
3.4%
Q2 24
4.2%
Q1 24
2.1%
Cash Conversion
AS
AS
ENS
ENS
Q4 25
2.04×
Q3 25
3.19×
Q2 25
0.02×
Q1 25
1.40×
Q4 24
0.71×
Q3 24
0.41×
Q2 24
0.15×
Q1 24
6.02×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

AS
AS

Americas2$409.6M39%
EMEA1$356.9M34%
Greater China3$205.6M20%
Asia Pacific4$78.2M7%

ENS
ENS

Energy Systems$399.5M43%
Motive Power$352.0M38%
Services$92.6M10%
Transferred Over Time$38.2M4%
Other$36.8M4%

Related Comparisons