vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Ardmore Shipping Corp (ASC) and Latham Group, Inc. (SWIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Latham Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($100.0M vs $81.2M, roughly 1.2× Ardmore Shipping Corp). Ardmore Shipping Corp runs the higher net margin — 15.7% vs -7.0%, a 22.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Latham Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.5% vs -15.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Latham Group, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-4.9% CAGR vs -6.0%).
Ardmore Shipping Corp is a global maritime transport company that owns and operates a fleet of mid-sized product and chemical tankers. It provides seaborne transport for petroleum products, specialty chemicals and bulk liquid commodities, serving energy, chemical and trading clients across key international trade routes.
Latham & Watkins LLP is an American multinational law firm. Founded in 1934 in Los Angeles, California, it is known for its litigation, corporate, and regulatory law practices.
ASC vs SWIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $81.2M | $100.0M |
| Net Profit | $12.8M | $-7.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | -10.7% |
| Net Margin | 15.7% | -7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -15.5% | 14.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -47.0% | 76.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.30 | $-0.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.2M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.0M | $172.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.0M | $111.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $87.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $96.1M | $150.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $121.3M | $160.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $106.3M | $110.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.6M | $16.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.1M | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $62.7M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.2M | $-7.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 32.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | -10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | -4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -14.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.2% | -1.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.3% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.5% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -33.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.1% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 36.9% | -7.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.30 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.14 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.55 | $0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.47 | $0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.92 | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $116.1M | $279.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $628.2M | $405.9M |
| Total Assets | $799.8M | $823.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | 0.69× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $279.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $116.1M | $281.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.0M | $281.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $306.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $281.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $282.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $44.2M | $282.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.1M | $282.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $405.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $628.2M | $408.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.3M | $398.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $610.7M | $381.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $387.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $627.0M | $416.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $617.7M | $408.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $567.9M | $391.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $823.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $799.8M | $844.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $703.8M | $822.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $690.4M | $824.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $794.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $722.8M | $853.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $742.0M | $830.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $704.1M | $808.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.18× | 0.69× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.04× | 0.71× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.03× | 0.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.04× | 0.68× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.04× | 0.72× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $17.9M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $14.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $38.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $51.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.2M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.3M | $-46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.9M | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.4M | $52.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $49.2M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $29.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-50.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -45.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 22.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -36.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.40× | 6.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | 2.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.20× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.65× | 6.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | 3.95× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.25× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASC
Segment breakdown not available.
SWIM
| In Ground Swimming Pools | $50.2M | 50% |
| Covers | $37.0M | 37% |
| Liners | $12.7M | 13% |
