vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASGN Inc (ASGN) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASGN Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($970.0M vs $790.1M, roughly 1.2× CALERES INC). ASGN Inc runs the higher net margin — 0.6% vs 0.3%, a 0.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -3.0%). ASGN Inc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($9.1M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -3.2%).
ASGN Inc is a leading U.S.-headquartered professional services and workforce solutions provider. It specializes in supplying skilled talent and consulting services across high-growth segments including information technology, creative, digital, life sciences, and engineering, primarily serving enterprise clients across North America.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
ASGN vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $970.0M | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.5M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $970.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $980.1M | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $968.3M | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $985.0M | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $659.2M |
| Q1 26 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.1% | 46.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.48 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.94 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $143.6M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.82× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.2M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.2M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $30.7M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $570.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $290.6M | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.9M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.9M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.2M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $36.1M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.8M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.9M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.9M | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.4M | $26.3M |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.20× | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.26× | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.92× | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASGN
Segment breakdown not available.
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
