vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CALERES INC (CAL) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.5× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 0.3%, a 5.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 6.6%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $-12.4M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
CAL vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2026 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $790.1M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $2.4M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 6.6% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -94.2% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.07 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $790.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $658.5M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $614.2M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $639.2M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $740.9M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $683.3M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $659.2M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.7M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.4M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.4% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.4% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.0% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.1% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.9% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.9% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.20 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.21 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.19 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.85 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.88 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $34.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $616.8M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $191.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $33.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $616.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $613.3M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $605.2M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $599.0M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $598.3M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $606.1M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $570.3M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.2M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-12.4M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.6% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.50× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $14.4M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-5.7M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.7M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-39.8M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $79.6M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.1M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.0M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-26.2M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.0M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-57.4M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.5M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.3M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.50× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.05× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.81× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.82× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.96× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.66× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.17× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
