vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASGN Inc (ASGN) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASGN Inc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($970.0M vs $625.1M, roughly 1.6× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 0.6%, a 12.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -3.0%). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($140.3M vs $9.1M). Over the past eight quarters, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (4.6% CAGR vs -3.2%).
ASGN Inc is a leading U.S.-headquartered professional services and workforce solutions provider. It specializes in supplying skilled talent and consulting services across high-growth segments including information technology, creative, digital, life sciences, and engineering, primarily serving enterprise clients across North America.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
ASGN vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $970.0M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $5.5M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 27.5% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 0.6% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.0% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -73.7% | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $970.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $980.1M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $968.3M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $985.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $25.2M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $38.1M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.3M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.5M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $47.2M | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | 27.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.9% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.4% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 28.7% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.4% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.0% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.1% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.1% | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.7% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.8% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.8% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.6% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.58 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.87 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.48 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.94 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.06 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.02 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $143.6M | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.8B | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.0B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.82× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $143.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $161.2M | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $205.2M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.7B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.82× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.72× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.57× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $9.1M | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.9% | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $290.6M | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.3M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.9M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $124.9M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.8M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.2M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $135.8M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $90.7M | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $93.7M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $72.0M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.8M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.9M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $127.9M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $85.4M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.1% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.5% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.06× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.20× | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.26× | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.36× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.86× | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.92× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
