vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of ASHLAND INC. (ASH) and OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($692.4M vs $386.0M, roughly 1.8× ASHLAND INC.). OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — 5.2% vs -3.1%, a 8.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.6% vs -4.7%). ASHLAND INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($111.0M vs $-76.5M). Over the past eight quarters, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC's revenue compounded faster (1.8% CAGR vs -18.1%).

Ashland, Inc., is an American chemical company headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware. The company began as an oil refinery in the city of Ashland, Kentucky, in 1924, before moving to Wilmington in 1994. The company has five wholly owned divisions, which include Chemical Intermediates and Solvents, composites, industrial specialties, personal and home care, pharmaceuticals, food and beverage, and agriculture. Until 2017, the company was the primary manufacturer of Valvoline.

Oceaneering International, Inc. is a subsea engineering and applied technology company based in Houston, Texas, U.S. that provides engineered services and hardware to customers who operate in marine, space, and other environments.

ASH vs OII — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OII
OII
1.8× larger
OII
$692.4M
$386.0M
ASH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
OII
OII
+8.3% gap
OII
3.6%
-4.7%
ASH
Higher net margin
OII
OII
8.3% more per $
OII
5.2%
-3.1%
ASH
More free cash flow
ASH
ASH
$187.5M more FCF
ASH
$111.0M
$-76.5M
OII
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
OII
OII
Annualised
OII
1.8%
-18.1%
ASH

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Revenue
$386.0M
$692.4M
Net Profit
$-12.0M
$36.1M
Gross Margin
27.2%
Operating Margin
-1.6%
Net Margin
-3.1%
5.2%
Revenue YoY
-4.7%
3.6%
Net Profit YoY
92.7%
-28.3%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.26
$0.36

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$692.4M
Q4 25
$386.0M
$668.6M
Q3 25
$477.0M
$742.9M
Q2 25
$463.0M
$698.2M
Q1 25
$479.0M
$674.5M
Q4 24
$405.0M
$713.5M
Q3 24
$521.0M
$679.8M
Q2 24
$544.0M
$668.8M
Net Profit
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$36.1M
Q4 25
$-12.0M
$177.7M
Q3 25
$31.0M
$71.3M
Q2 25
$-742.0M
$54.4M
Q1 25
$31.0M
$50.4M
Q4 24
$-165.0M
$56.1M
Q3 24
$17.0M
$41.2M
Q2 24
$6.0M
$35.0M
Gross Margin
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
Q4 25
27.2%
19.8%
Q3 25
33.3%
20.6%
Q2 25
28.5%
21.3%
Q1 25
30.7%
20.0%
Q4 24
27.4%
19.9%
Q3 24
33.2%
19.3%
Q2 24
34.2%
18.0%
Operating Margin
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
Q4 25
-1.6%
9.8%
Q3 25
12.8%
11.6%
Q2 25
-152.9%
11.3%
Q1 25
10.6%
10.9%
Q4 24
-44.2%
10.9%
Q3 24
6.1%
10.5%
Q2 24
-11.2%
9.0%
Net Margin
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
5.2%
Q4 25
-3.1%
26.6%
Q3 25
6.5%
9.6%
Q2 25
-160.3%
7.8%
Q1 25
6.5%
7.5%
Q4 24
-40.7%
7.9%
Q3 24
3.3%
6.1%
Q2 24
1.1%
5.2%
EPS (diluted)
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$0.36
Q4 25
$-0.26
$1.75
Q3 25
$0.83
$0.71
Q2 25
$-16.21
$0.54
Q1 25
$0.65
$0.49
Q4 24
$-3.50
$0.55
Q3 24
$0.34
$0.40
Q2 24
$0.12
$0.34

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$304.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$1.4B
$488.8M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.9B
$1.1B
Total Assets
$4.5B
$2.6B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.74×
0.44×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
Q4 25
$304.0M
$695.9M
Q3 25
$215.0M
$7.0M
Q2 25
$207.0M
$7.0M
Q1 25
$168.0M
$7.0M
Q4 24
$219.0M
$504.5M
Q3 24
$300.0M
Q2 24
$399.0M
Total Debt
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$488.8M
Q4 25
$1.4B
$487.4M
Q3 25
$1.4B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$1.3B
$482.0M
Q3 24
$1.3B
Q2 24
$1.3B
Stockholders' Equity
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$1.1B
Q4 25
$1.9B
$1.1B
Q3 25
$1.9B
$907.7M
Q2 25
$1.9B
$842.1M
Q1 25
$2.6B
$773.1M
Q4 24
$2.6B
$714.3M
Q3 24
$2.9B
$698.0M
Q2 24
$3.0B
$651.0M
Total Assets
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$2.6B
Q4 25
$4.5B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$4.6B
$2.5B
Q2 25
$4.6B
$2.3B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$2.3B
Q4 24
$5.2B
$2.3B
Q3 24
$5.6B
$2.4B
Q2 24
$5.7B
$2.3B
Debt / Equity
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
0.44×
Q4 25
0.74×
0.46×
Q3 25
0.73×
Q2 25
0.73×
Q1 25
0.52×
Q4 24
0.51×
0.67×
Q3 24
0.47×
Q2 24
0.45×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$125.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$111.0M
$-76.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
28.8%
-11.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
3.6%
2.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$200.0M
$238.1M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
Q4 25
$125.0M
$221.1M
Q3 25
$40.0M
$101.3M
Q2 25
$115.0M
$77.2M
Q1 25
$9.0M
$-80.7M
Q4 24
$-30.0M
$128.4M
Q3 24
$80.0M
$91.9M
Q2 24
$127.0M
$52.6M
Free Cash Flow
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
$-76.5M
Q4 25
$111.0M
$190.7M
Q3 25
$6.0M
$77.0M
Q2 25
$95.0M
$46.9M
Q1 25
$-12.0M
$-106.8M
Q4 24
$-53.0M
$94.5M
Q3 24
$42.0M
$67.0M
Q2 24
$98.0M
$29.8M
FCF Margin
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
-11.1%
Q4 25
28.8%
28.5%
Q3 25
1.3%
10.4%
Q2 25
20.5%
6.7%
Q1 25
-2.5%
-15.8%
Q4 24
-13.1%
13.2%
Q3 24
8.1%
9.9%
Q2 24
18.0%
4.5%
Capex Intensity
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
2.5%
Q4 25
3.6%
4.6%
Q3 25
7.1%
3.3%
Q2 25
4.3%
4.3%
Q1 25
4.4%
3.9%
Q4 24
5.7%
4.7%
Q3 24
7.3%
3.7%
Q2 24
5.3%
3.4%
Cash Conversion
ASH
ASH
OII
OII
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.24×
Q3 25
1.29×
1.42×
Q2 25
1.42×
Q1 25
0.29×
-1.60×
Q4 24
2.29×
Q3 24
4.71×
2.23×
Q2 24
21.17×
1.50×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ASH
ASH

Personal Care And Household$123.0M32%
Other$120.0M31%
Specialty Additives$36.0M9%
Intermediates And Solvents$31.0M8%
Personal Care$30.0M8%
Life Sciences$27.0M7%
Intermediates$19.0M5%

OII
OII

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons