vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.3× AdvanSix Inc.). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs -0.8%, a 30.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 9.4%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
ASIX vs CBSH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $475.7M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $141.6M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | — |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 29.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 0.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $475.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $449.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $441.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $445.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $428.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $422.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $421.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $414.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $141.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $140.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $141.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $152.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $131.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $136.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $138.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $139.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 40.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 41.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 39.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 41.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 43.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 31.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 32.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 30.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 32.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 33.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.96 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.86 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $1.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $1.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.83 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $1.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $4.3B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $35.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $3.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $35.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $32.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $32.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $32.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $32.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $32.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $31.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $30.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $645.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $129.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $111.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $138.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $577.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $431.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $147.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $592.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $113.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $100.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $126.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $531.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $138.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 131.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 29.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 126.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 99.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 33.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 2.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.05× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 4.25× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 3.13× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 1.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.