vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $217.6M, roughly 1.7× Dine Brands Global, Inc.). AdvanSix Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -5.6%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 6.3%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-8.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AdvanSix Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (3.4% CAGR vs 2.7%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Dine Brands Global Inc. is a publicly traded food and beverage company based in Pasadena, California. Founded in 1958 as IHOP, it operates franchised and corporate owned full-service restaurants including three restaurant concepts, Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar, International House of Pancakes (IHOP), and Fuzzy's Taco Shop.
ASIX vs DIN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $217.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-12.2M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 42.4% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | -7.6% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -5.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -336.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.79 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $217.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $216.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $230.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $214.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $204.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $195.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $206.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $206.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $-12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $13.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $8.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $23.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 42.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 40.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 42.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 41.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 47.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 48.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 47.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | -7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 11.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 8.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.79 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $1.50 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $1.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $128.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $-273.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $128.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $167.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $194.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $186.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $186.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $169.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $153.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $145.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $-273.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $-231.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $-212.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $-215.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $-216.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $-216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $-231.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $-244.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $5.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-8.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -3.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 6.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $53.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $30.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $16.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $25.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $30.6M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $12.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $18.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $27.2M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | -3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 6.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 11.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | 13.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 6.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 5.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 0.93× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.75× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
DIN
| Franchisor | $163.2M | 75% |
| Food And Beverage | $27.3M | 13% |
| Proprietary Product Sales And Other | $17.0M | 8% |
| Other | $8.1M | 4% |
| Franchise And Development Fees | $2.0M | 1% |
