vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($420.0M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.2× AdvanSix Inc.). Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 57.0% vs -0.8%, a 57.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. is a real estate investment trust (REIT) specializing in casino properties, based in Wyomissing, Pennsylvania. It was formed in November 2013 as a corporate spin-off from Penn National Gaming. The company owns 62 casino properties, all of which are leased to other companies.
ASIX vs GLPI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $420.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $239.4M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 79.4% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 57.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 40.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $420.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $407.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $397.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $394.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $395.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $389.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $385.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $380.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $239.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $275.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $241.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $151.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $165.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $223.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $184.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $208.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 79.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 89.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 84.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 65.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 77.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 57.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 67.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 38.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 57.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 54.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.79 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.67 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.77 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $274.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $5.0B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $13.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $274.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $560.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $4.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $12.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $12.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $11.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.56× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.60× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $240.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $293.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $252.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $270.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $252.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $183.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $272.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $239.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $261.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $245.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 46.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 69.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 60.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 275.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 67.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 64.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.94× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.53× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 4.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.46× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 1.21× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
GLPI
Segment breakdown not available.
