vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and H2O AMERICA (HTO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $199.4M, roughly 1.8× H2O AMERICA). H2O AMERICA runs the higher net margin — 8.1% vs -0.8%, a 8.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 1.5%). Over the past eight quarters, H2O AMERICA's revenue compounded faster (15.3% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
H2O Wireless is a United States-based prepaid cell phone service, that utilizes the AT&T network. It is a brand of the mobile virtual network operator (MVNO) Locus Telecommunications, a subsidiary of Telrite Holdings, Inc., since 2019. Locus was formerly a subsidiary of KDDI America corporation, starting in 2010. H2O Wireless is primarily advertised as a non-restrictive phone service for customers to bring or buy unlocked smartphones, although AT&T contract/locked phones may be accepted as well.
ASIX vs HTO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $199.4M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $16.2M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 16.6% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 8.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 1.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -29.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $199.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $243.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $197.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $164.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $196.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $216.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $173.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $150.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $16.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $45.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $24.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $16.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $22.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $38.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 23.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 18.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 17.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | 7.8% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $1.27 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.71 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $1.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.64 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $20.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.9B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $19.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $23.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $22.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $4.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $4.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $63.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.92× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $63.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $77.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $60.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $43.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $53.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $49.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.92× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 2.61× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 1.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 2.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.38× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
HTO
| Water Utility Services | $191.0M | 96% |
| Other | $8.4M | 4% |
