vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and PEGASYSTEMS INC (PEGA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
PEGASYSTEMS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($430.0M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.2× AdvanSix Inc.). PEGASYSTEMS INC runs the higher net margin — 7.6% vs -0.8%, a 8.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -9.6%). PEGASYSTEMS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($206.5M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PEGASYSTEMS INC's revenue compounded faster (10.7% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Pegasystems Inc. (Pega) is a global software company based in Waltham, Massachusetts, in the United States, and founded in 1983. The company has been publicly traded since 1996 as PEGA (NASDAQ). Pega is a low-code platform for workflow automation and generative AI-powered decision-making for businesses.
ASIX vs PEGA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $430.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $32.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 8.6% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 7.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -61.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $430.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $504.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $381.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $384.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $475.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $490.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $325.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $351.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $234.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $43.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $30.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $85.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $119.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $-14.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $6.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | 75.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 79.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 72.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 78.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 79.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 70.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 72.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 29.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 3.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 46.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 18.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 24.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | -4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.18 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.81 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $1.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $270.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $705.9M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $270.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $425.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $351.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $411.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $371.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $740.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $703.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $665.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $705.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $787.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $596.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $624.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $611.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $585.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $473.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $435.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $206.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 48.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $494.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $56.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $86.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $204.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $95.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $40.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $206.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $152.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $84.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $202.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $92.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $38.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 30.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 42.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.68× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 2.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 0.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 6.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
PEGA
| Pega Cloud | $205.0M | 48% |
| Subscription license | $94.9M | 22% |
| Maintenance | $75.3M | 18% |
| Consulting | $54.8M | 13% |
