vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $219.2M, roughly 1.6× Perella Weinberg Partners). Perella Weinberg Partners runs the higher net margin — 6.3% vs -0.8%, a 7.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -2.9%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $30.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Perella Weinberg Partners's revenue compounded faster (46.5% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
PJT Partners, Inc. is a global advisory-focused investment bank, founded in October 2015 as part of The Blackstone Group's spin-off of its financial and strategic advisory services businesses.
ASIX vs PWP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $219.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $13.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -2.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $219.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $164.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $155.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $211.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $225.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $278.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $272.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $102.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $17.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $16.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $-66.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | -30.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | -52.4% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -24.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | -35.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.24 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $-0.91 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $255.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $-127.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $797.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $255.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $185.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $145.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $111.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $407.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $335.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $185.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $156.7M |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | $-127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $-302.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $-318.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $-323.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $-421.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $-360.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $-283.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $161.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $797.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $650.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $606.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $570.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $876.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $810.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $645.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $583.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $34.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 13.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.52× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $-34.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | $34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $59.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $56.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-176.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $223.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $200.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-206.3M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $57.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $55.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-177.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $207.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $199.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $83.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-214.8M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 35.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 35.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -83.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 91.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 71.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 30.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -210.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.52× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 20.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | -10.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 12.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
PWP
Segment breakdown not available.