vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Savers Value Village, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($426.9M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.2× AdvanSix Inc.). AdvanSix Inc. runs the higher net margin — -0.8% vs -3.3%, a 2.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs 8.1%). AdvanSix Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($36.1M vs $-6.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Savers Value Village, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (4.3% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Value Village Stores, Inc. was a Midwestern United States chain of retail stores aimed at the discount department-store market. Henry Horney, formerly of F.W. Woolworth Company founded a small, regional chain of discount stores located in the two states of Wisconsin and Illinois that opened in 1961 and operated into 1989. Horney also had a real estate company and often built small shopping malls adjoining the discount stores. The chain had no relation to the Savers Value Village chain of thri...
ASIX vs SVV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $426.9M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $-14.0M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 8.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | -3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -164.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.09 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $426.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $417.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $370.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $402.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $394.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $386.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $336.8M | $354.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-17.4M | $-467.0K |
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 24.2% |
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 8.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 8.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.0% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | -0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.2% | -0.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.65 | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $63.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $750.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $414.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $63.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $70.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $73.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $137.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | $160.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.6M | $102.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $750.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $423.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $413.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $421.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $432.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $419.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $713.2M | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $21.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $-6.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | -1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 6.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $25.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $54.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $419.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $55.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $23.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-36.2M | $-5.8M |
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $21.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-20.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $30.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $29.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.6M | $-28.3M |
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.3% | -8.0% |
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 8.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.5% | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 2.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 6.22× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
SVV
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $408.3M | 96% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $18.6M | 4% |
