vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC (USNA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AdvanSix Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($359.9M vs $250.2M, roughly 1.4× USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC). USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC runs the higher net margin — 3.0% vs -0.8%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AdvanSix Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.4% vs -3.0%). Over the past eight quarters, USANA HEALTH SCIENCES INC's revenue compounded faster (11.8% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Usana Health Sciences, Inc., or USANA, is an American multi-level marketing company based in Salt Lake City, Utah. As of 2021, Usana was the 14th largest direct-selling company in the world by revenue. The company manufactures most of its nutritional products, dietary supplements, and skincare products at a Salt Lake City facility. Its products are sold in 24 countries via a network of independent distributors.
ASIX vs USNA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2027
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $250.2M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $7.5M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 5.5% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | -3.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | -20.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $250.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | $226.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $213.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $235.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $249.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $213.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $200.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | $180.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $-6.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 76.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | 78.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 78.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 79.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 82.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 80.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 7.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | -3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.41 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $739.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | $158.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | $145.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | $151.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | $179.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | $364.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $528.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $531.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $529.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $532.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $533.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $739.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $742.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $726.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $734.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $746.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $748.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $671.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $-5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $27.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | -2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.27× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.78× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
USNA
Segment breakdown not available.
