vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) and Sensata Technologies Holding plc (ST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.4B vs $934.8M, roughly 1.5× Sensata Technologies Holding plc). Sensata Technologies Holding plc runs the higher net margin — 9.3% vs 5.2%, a 4.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Academy Sports & Outdoors, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.0% vs 2.6%). Sensata Technologies Holding plc produced more free cash flow last quarter ($104.6M vs $-13.6M). Over the past eight quarters, Sensata Technologies Holding plc's revenue compounded faster (-5.0% CAGR vs -12.2%).
Academy Sports + Outdoors is an American sporting-goods store chain with corporate offices in the Katy Distribution Center in unincorporated western Harris County, Texas, United States, near Katy and west of Houston. For 74 years, it was a privately held company owned by the Gochman family, until its May 2011 acquisition by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts. In October 2020, it was listed on NASDAQ.
Sensata Technologies Holding plc is a global industrial technology company that designs, manufactures and sells a broad portfolio of sensing, electrical protection and control solutions. Its products serve automotive, industrial, aerospace, HVAC, telecommunications and heavy vehicle end markets, catering to manufacturing and enterprise clients across the world.
ASO vs ST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.4B | $934.8M |
| Net Profit | $71.6M | $87.1M |
| Gross Margin | 35.7% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 7.3% | 15.1% |
| Net Margin | 5.2% | 9.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 3.0% | 2.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.8% | 24.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.05 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $934.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $917.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $932.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $943.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $911.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $907.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $982.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $71.6M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $125.4M | $-162.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.1M | $60.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $133.6M | $69.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.8M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.6M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $76.5M | $71.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | 35.7% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.0% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.0% | 30.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.2% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 36.1% | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.4% | 30.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.8% | -13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.3% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.5% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | -17.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.0% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.2% | -2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.6% | 6.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.05 | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.85 | $-1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.68 | $0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.85 | $0.47 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.95 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.01 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $289.5M | $635.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $5.4B | $6.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $635.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $289.5M | $573.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $300.9M | $791.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $285.1M | $661.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $288.9M | $588.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $296.0M | $593.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.6M | $506.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $378.1M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $7.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.1B | $7.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.9B | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | $8.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.0M | $122.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-13.6M | $104.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.0% | 11.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.68× | 1.41× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $191.4M | $508.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $122.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $49.0M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $78.6M | $159.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $157.5M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $140.2M | $119.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $96.9M | $170.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.3M | $130.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $143.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $104.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-13.6M | $151.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8M | $136.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $106.6M | $115.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.4M | $86.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $34.4M | $138.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.1M | $91.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $167.4M | $98.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.0% | 16.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.9% | 12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | 9.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.5% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.68× | 3.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.42× | 2.32× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 1.70× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.47× | 29.50× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.61× | 2.00× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASO
| Outdoors | $445.1M | 32% |
| Apparel | $349.8M | 25% |
| Footwear | $292.4M | 21% |
| Sports And Recreation | $288.7M | 21% |
| Other | $7.6M | 1% |
ST
Segment breakdown not available.
