vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Strive, Inc. (ASST) and LQR House Inc. (YHC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
LQR House Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($299.7K vs $255.0K, roughly 1.2× Strive, Inc.). LQR House Inc. runs the higher net margin — -1368.7% vs -75406.7%, a 74037.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LQR House Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-64.2% vs -74.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Strive, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (77.6% CAGR vs -21.1%).
Strive Asset Management is an American investment management firm founded in 2022. The firm operates mutual funds, exchange-traded products (ETPs), and wealth management services. Headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, it operates as a subsidiary of Strive Enterprises, Inc. and is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an investment adviser.
LQR House Inc. is a US-based alcohol beverage e-commerce and distribution company. It offers a broad portfolio of spirits, wine, and beer, operating two core segments: direct-to-consumer retail for individuals and wholesale distribution for business clients across the United States.
ASST vs YHC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $255.0K | $299.7K |
| Net Profit | $-192.3M | $-4.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Operating Margin | -17288.6% | -1000.3% |
| Net Margin | -75406.7% | -1368.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -74.1% | -64.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2726.9% | 72.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.22 | $2.94 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $299.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.0K | $337.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $173.3K | $498.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $170.7K | $429.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.8K | $838.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $984.0K | $624.5K | ||
| Q2 24 | $93.0K | $557.9K | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.8K | $481.1K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-192.3M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.7M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.1M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.8M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.8M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -27.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1000.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17288.6% | -1134.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1553.9% | -442.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -970.5% | -559.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5889.5% | -1221.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -712.4% | -561.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1857.2% | -407.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -1110.9% | -513.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1368.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -75406.7% | -4989.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5122.4% | -441.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2195.6% | -556.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1935.5% | -1760.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -691.3% | -538.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -6313.1% | -396.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3837.7% | -504.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.94 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.22 | $-1.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.17 | $-1.10 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.13 | $-3.85 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.62 | $-88.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.06 | $-21.84 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.58 | $-15.49 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.49 | $-18.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $109.1M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $779.4M | $29.3M |
| Total Assets | $792.6M | $31.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.1M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9M | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.9M | $4.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $29.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $779.4M | $27.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.6M | $7.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $23.3M | $-518.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.3M | $12.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $792.6M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $14.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.0M | $9.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $12.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.0M | $-14.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-14.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-14.0M | $-11.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.6M | $-6.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.6M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.2M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.1M | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -10161.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1360.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1379.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -844.7% | -287.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.5% | 2.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
