vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTROTECH Corp (ASTC) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASTROTECH Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($148.0K vs $93.2K, roughly 1.6× InMode Ltd.). InMode Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 23.5% vs -2653.4%, a 2676.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Astrotech Corporation, formerly Spacehab Inc., is a technology incubator headquartered in Austin, Texas. Astrotech uses technology sourced internally and from research institutions, government laboratories, and universities to fund, manage and sell start-up companies. Astrotech Corporation's subsidiaries provide commercial products and services to NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, national space agencies, and global commercial customers.
Mode Media, Inc., was a digital lifestyle media company operating a suite of websites where content was produced by anyone but reviewed by professional editors prior to publishing. In 2013, Mode Media had a valuation of about $1 billion as the company prepped for an IPO. In 2015, Mode Media had grown to over $100 million in revenue, primarily from providing native content, branded video and digital advertising to large brands but had over $100 million in expenses.
ASTC vs INMD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $148.0K | $93.2K |
| Net Profit | $-3.9M | $21.9K |
| Gross Margin | 5.4% | 77.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2635.8% | — |
| Net Margin | -2653.4% | 23.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.3% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 2.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $148.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.0K | $93.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $220.0K | $95.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $534.0K | $77.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | $261.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.2K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $86.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $80.3K |
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.5M | $21.9K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.9M | $26.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.6M | $18.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $51.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $23.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.7K |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.3% | 77.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 33.6% | 80.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.4% | 78.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 81.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 80.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 79.6% |
| Q4 25 | -2635.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1190.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1326.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -724.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1655.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -2653.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1166.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1331.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -680.3% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1536.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.5% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.0M | $155.3K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.5M | $703.8K |
| Total Assets | $19.7M | $785.7K |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $7.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.3M | $155.3K | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.1M | $155.3K | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.1M | $155.3K | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $144.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $144.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $144.4K |
| Q4 25 | $15.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $703.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.1M | $703.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $24.8M | $703.8K | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $787.4K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $787.4K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $787.4K |
| Q4 25 | $19.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.2M | $785.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.0M | $785.7K | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.5M | $785.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $863.3K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $863.3K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $863.3K |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.5M | $24.5K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -2671.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 277.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.12× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-14.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-3.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.9M | $24.5K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.4M | $24.1K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $14.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $42.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.1K |
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -2671.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1476.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1231.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -728.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1288.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 277.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 150.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 158.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 122.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.02× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
