vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC (ASTE) and Okta, Inc. (OKTA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Okta, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($742.0M vs $400.6M, roughly 1.9× ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC). Okta, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 3.0%, a 2.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.6% vs 11.6%). Okta, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($214.0M vs $7.4M). Over the past eight quarters, ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs 10.7%).
Astec International plc, better known as Astec Power or just Astec, was an international electronics company originally based in Hong Kong that manufactured power supply units and electric power conversion hardware. It was a major vendor of power supply units for computer systems, and for a time it was the largest global manufacturer of power supplies.
Okta, Inc. is an American identity and access management company based in San Francisco. It provides cloud software that helps companies manage and secure user authentication into applications, and for developers to build identity controls into applications, websites, web services, and devices. It was founded in 2009 and had its initial public offering in 2017, reaching a valuation of over $6 billion.
ASTE vs OKTA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $400.6M | $742.0M |
| Net Profit | $12.0M | $43.0M |
| Gross Margin | 27.3% | 77.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.6% | 11.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.1% | 168.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.52 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $400.6M | $742.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $350.1M | $728.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.3M | $688.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.4M | $682.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $359.0M | $665.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.4M | $646.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $345.5M | $617.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $309.2M | $605.0M |
| Q4 25 | $12.0M | $43.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $67.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.7M | $62.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.1M | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $29.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-14.0M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4M | $-44.0M |
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 77.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 24.1% | 76.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.7% | 77.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.1% | 76.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.7% | 76.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.9% | 76.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | 76.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 24.9% | 76.0% |
| Q4 25 | 5.7% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.7% | -2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.5% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.1% | -7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.0% | -13.7% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.2% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.1% | -6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.1% | -7.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.52 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.18 | $0.37 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.72 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.92 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.27 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.61 | $-0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.15 | $-0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $74.1M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $681.7M | $6.9B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $9.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $74.1M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.8M | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $91.6M | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $95.4M | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.8M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.9M | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $68.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $63.8M | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | $681.7M | $6.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $668.9M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $674.9M | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $653.2M | $6.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $637.8M | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $631.4M | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $633.3M | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $650.3M | $5.9B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $9.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $9.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $9.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $9.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $9.0B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $36.1M | $218.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $7.4M | $214.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.8% | 28.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.2% | 0.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.01× | 5.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $20.7M | $904.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.1M | $167.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.9M | $241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.5M | $286.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.6M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9M | $219.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-47.0M | $174.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.4M | $214.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-12.3M | $165.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.0M | $240.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | $285.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.1M | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.9M | $81.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3M | $218.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-52.8M | $171.0M |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | 28.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.5% | 22.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 34.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.9% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.8% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.0% | 35.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.1% | 28.3% |
| Q4 25 | 7.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.01× | 5.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.77× | 3.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.43× | 12.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.73× | 9.94× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -13.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASTE
| Infrastructure Group | $208.7M | 52% |
| Material Solutions | $105.3M | 26% |
| Parts And Component Sales | $58.3M | 15% |
| Other | $15.3M | 4% |
| Service And Equipment Installation Revenue | $6.9M | 2% |
| Cargo And Freight | $6.1M | 2% |
OKTA
| Subscription And Circulation | $724.0M | 98% |
| Technology Service | $18.0M | 2% |
