vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd (ATAT) and CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CLEAN HARBORS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.5B vs $789.6M, roughly 1.9× Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd). Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — 17.6% vs 5.8%, a 11.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (252.5% vs 4.8%). CLEAN HARBORS INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($233.3M vs $210.7M).
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is a leading China-based hospitality and lifestyle enterprise. It operates a wide portfolio of mid-to-premium hotel brands for business and leisure travelers, and offers complementary lifestyle retail products and experience services, catering primarily to middle-class consumers across domestic and selected overseas markets.
Clean Harbors, Inc., headquartered in Norwell, Massachusetts, is a provider of waste management and industrial services for commercial customers, specializing in the collection, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous waste, but also offering services for non-hazardous waste. The company has 870 operating locations in 630 properties in the U.S. and Canada including a network of over 100 waste disposal facilities such as incinerators, landfills, treatment, storage and disposal faci...
ATAT vs CLH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $789.6M | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $86.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 10.6% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 252.5% | 4.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 322.2% | 3.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $1.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $789.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $203.4M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $86.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.1M | $118.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $126.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $58.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $84.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | $115.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $133.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.6M | $69.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 30.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 29.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 12.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.1% | 9.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $2.21 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.55 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $2.12 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.46 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | $1.29 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $669.2M | $127.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.0M | $2.7B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $7.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $127.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $669.2M | $91.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $98.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $105.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $102.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $82.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $91.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $520.7M | $104.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $277.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.5M | $2.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $927.8M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $936.3M | $6.9B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $216.6M | $355.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $210.7M | $233.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.7% | 15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 8.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | 4.10× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $359.6M | $441.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $355.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.6M | $302.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $303.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $239.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $216.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $18.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $233.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.7M | $207.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-117.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $241.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $142.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $80.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | $-119.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | -8.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | 10.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | 2.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.62× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | 0.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATAT
Segment breakdown not available.
CLH
| Technical Services | $479.3M | 32% |
| Safetly Kleen Environmental Services | $252.9M | 17% |
| Fieldand Emergency Response | $246.6M | 16% |
| Products | $205.3M | 14% |
| Safety Kleen Sustainability Solutions Segment | $188.4M | 13% |
| Safety Kleen Oil | $132.6M | 9% |
