vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd (ATAT) and Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($789.6M vs $395.6M, roughly 2.0× Dolby Laboratories, Inc.). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 24.0% vs 17.6%, a 6.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (252.5% vs 7.1%).
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is a leading China-based hospitality and lifestyle enterprise. It operates a wide portfolio of mid-to-premium hotel brands for business and leisure travelers, and offers complementary lifestyle retail products and experience services, catering primarily to middle-class consumers across domestic and selected overseas markets.
Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is an American technology corporation specializing in audio noise reduction, audio encoding/compression, spatial audio, and high-dynamic-range television (HDR) imaging. Dolby licenses its technologies to consumer electronics manufacturers.
ATAT vs DLB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $789.6M | $395.6M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $94.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | 88.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 28.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | 24.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 252.5% | 7.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 322.2% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q2 26 | — | $395.6M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $346.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $789.6M | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $315.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $369.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $357.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $304.8M |
| Q2 26 | — | $94.9M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $53.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.1M | $49.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $91.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | $58.6M |
| Q2 26 | — | 88.7% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 86.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 90.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 88.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 15.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 19.2% |
| Q2 26 | — | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | $0.50 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.48 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.70 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $0.59 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $669.2M | $594.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.0M | $2.6B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $3.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $594.7M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $644.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $669.2M | $702.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $699.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $626.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $520.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $482.0M |
| Q2 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.3M | $2.5B |
| Q2 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $927.8M | $3.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $216.6M | $147.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $210.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | 1.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $359.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q2 26 | — | $147.3M | ||
| Q1 26 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $54.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.6M | $472.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $174.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $106.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $327.3M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $50.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.7M | $435.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $61.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $100.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | $297.2M |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | 142.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | 97.5% |
| Q2 26 | — | — | ||
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | 9.8% |
| Q2 26 | — | 1.55× | ||
| Q1 26 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | 9.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 5.59× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATAT
Segment breakdown not available.
DLB
| Licensing | $372.2M | 94% |
| Products and services | $23.4M | 6% |
