vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd (ATAT) and Kimco Realty (KIM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($789.6M vs $542.5M, roughly 1.5× Kimco Realty). Kimco Realty runs the higher net margin — 27.9% vs 17.6%, a 10.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (252.5% vs 3.2%).
Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd is a leading China-based hospitality and lifestyle enterprise. It operates a wide portfolio of mid-to-premium hotel brands for business and leisure travelers, and offers complementary lifestyle retail products and experience services, catering primarily to middle-class consumers across domestic and selected overseas markets.
Kimco Realty Corporation, headquartered in Jericho, New York, is a real estate investment trust that invests in shopping centers.
ATAT vs KIM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $789.6M | $542.5M |
| Net Profit | $139.1M | $151.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 22.5% | 36.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.6% | 27.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 252.5% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 322.2% | -9.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.33 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $542.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $789.6M | $535.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $525.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $536.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $525.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $224.0M | $507.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $500.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $203.4M | $503.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $139.1M | $137.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $163.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $166.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.6M | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 34.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 33.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.1% | 25.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 17.6% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 31.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.7% | 26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 17.5% | -2.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.33 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.09 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $669.2M | $211.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $405.0M | $10.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $19.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.74× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $211.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $669.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $226.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $131.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $688.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $506.0M | $789.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $126.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $520.7M | $133.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $7.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $277.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $405.0M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $10.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $291.3M | $10.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $10.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $323.5M | $10.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $19.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $19.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $927.8M | $20.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $936.3M | $19.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $216.6M | $258.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $210.7M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.56× | 1.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $359.6M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $258.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $216.6M | $332.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $305.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $223.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $84.8M | $295.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.8M | $176.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $210.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $205.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $18.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 37.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.56× | 2.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 2.18× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.46× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.56× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
