vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) and Lemonade, Inc. (LMND). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Lemonade, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($228.1M vs $212.9M, roughly 1.1× Alphatec Holdings, Inc.). Lemonade, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -9.5% vs -10.2%, a 0.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Lemonade, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (53.3% vs 20.4%). Alphatec Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($7.7M vs $-25.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Lemonade, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (38.4% CAGR vs 24.0%).

Alphatec Holdings, Inc. is a global medical technology company specializing in spinal surgery solutions. It designs, develops and markets spinal implants, surgical instruments and digital surgery platforms for orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures, serving providers across North America, Europe and core Asia-Pacific markets, addressing degeneration, deformity and trauma spinal pathologies.

Lemonade, Inc. is an American insurance company. The company offers renters' insurance, homeowners' insurance, car insurance, pet insurance, and term life insurance in the United States, as well as contents and liability policies in Germany and the Netherlands and renters' insurance in France. The company is based in New York City and has approximately 2.9 million customers. Lemonade does not hire human employees to process claims for customers, instead using artificial intelligence and chatb...

ATEC vs LMND — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
LMND
LMND
1.1× larger
LMND
$228.1M
$212.9M
ATEC
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
LMND
LMND
+32.9% gap
LMND
53.3%
20.4%
ATEC
Higher net margin
LMND
LMND
0.7% more per $
LMND
-9.5%
-10.2%
ATEC
More free cash flow
ATEC
ATEC
$33.6M more FCF
ATEC
$7.7M
$-25.9M
LMND
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
LMND
LMND
Annualised
LMND
38.4%
24.0%
ATEC

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Revenue
$212.9M
$228.1M
Net Profit
$-21.7M
$-21.7M
Gross Margin
70.2%
Operating Margin
-4.1%
-9.0%
Net Margin
-10.2%
-9.5%
Revenue YoY
20.4%
53.3%
Net Profit YoY
34.8%
27.7%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.15
$-0.27

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$212.9M
$228.1M
Q3 25
$196.5M
$194.5M
Q2 25
$185.5M
$164.1M
Q1 25
$169.2M
$151.2M
Q4 24
$176.8M
$148.8M
Q3 24
$150.7M
$136.6M
Q2 24
$145.6M
$122.0M
Q1 24
$138.5M
$119.1M
Net Profit
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$-21.7M
$-21.7M
Q3 25
$-28.6M
$-37.5M
Q2 25
$-41.1M
$-43.9M
Q1 25
$-51.9M
$-62.4M
Q4 24
$-33.3M
$-30.0M
Q3 24
$-39.6M
$-67.7M
Q2 24
$-40.7M
$-57.2M
Q1 24
$-48.5M
$-47.3M
Gross Margin
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
70.2%
Q3 25
69.9%
Q2 25
69.6%
Q1 25
68.6%
Q4 24
68.8%
Q3 24
68.2%
Q2 24
70.5%
Q1 24
70.3%
Operating Margin
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
-4.1%
-9.0%
Q3 25
-8.1%
-18.7%
Q2 25
-7.1%
-26.0%
Q1 25
-26.2%
-40.6%
Q4 24
-13.5%
-25.4%
Q3 24
-22.4%
-48.2%
Q2 24
-24.3%
-45.2%
Q1 24
-31.3%
-38.0%
Net Margin
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
-10.2%
-9.5%
Q3 25
-14.5%
-19.3%
Q2 25
-22.2%
-26.8%
Q1 25
-30.7%
-41.3%
Q4 24
-18.9%
-20.2%
Q3 24
-26.3%
-49.6%
Q2 24
-27.9%
-46.9%
Q1 24
-35.0%
-39.7%
EPS (diluted)
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$-0.15
$-0.27
Q3 25
$-0.19
$-0.51
Q2 25
$-0.27
$-0.60
Q1 25
$-0.35
$-0.86
Q4 24
$-0.22
$-0.42
Q3 24
$-0.28
$-0.95
Q2 24
$-0.29
$-0.81
Q1 24
$-0.34
$-0.67

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$160.8M
$399.1M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$565.9M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$12.4M
$533.6M
Total Assets
$791.2M
$1.9B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
45.54×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$160.8M
$399.1M
Q3 25
$155.7M
$369.4M
Q2 25
$157.1M
$398.8M
Q1 25
$153.2M
$329.7M
Q4 24
$138.8M
$403.5M
Q3 24
$81.0M
$360.9M
Q2 24
$99.8M
$387.2M
Q1 24
$144.1M
$300.8M
Total Debt
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$565.9M
Q3 25
$559.7M
Q2 25
$553.9M
Q1 25
$548.4M
Q4 24
$576.2M
Q3 24
$527.7M
Q2 24
$519.2M
Q1 24
$514.4M
Stockholders' Equity
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$12.4M
$533.6M
Q3 25
$11.5M
$516.2M
Q2 25
$23.8M
$527.1M
Q1 25
$-85.9M
$545.5M
Q4 24
$-14.2M
$593.4M
Q3 24
$-1.4M
$593.0M
Q2 24
$17.1M
$635.2M
Q1 24
$37.6M
$676.4M
Total Assets
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$791.2M
$1.9B
Q3 25
$787.2M
$1.9B
Q2 25
$790.3M
$1.9B
Q1 25
$785.5M
$1.9B
Q4 24
$775.7M
$1.8B
Q3 24
$745.9M
$1.8B
Q2 24
$768.6M
$1.7B
Q1 24
$774.6M
$1.6B
Debt / Equity
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
45.54×
Q3 25
48.64×
Q2 25
23.30×
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
30.34×
Q1 24
13.70×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$20.7M
$-16.5M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$7.7M
$-25.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
3.6%
-11.4%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
6.1%
4.1%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$2.8M
$-69.4M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$20.7M
$-16.5M
Q3 25
$14.0M
$4.5M
Q2 25
$15.5M
$5.5M
Q1 25
$-5.0M
$-47.2M
Q4 24
$10.5M
$-11.4M
Q3 24
$-5.3M
$16.3M
Q2 24
$-11.4M
$-11.7M
Q1 24
$-38.4M
$-29.8M
Free Cash Flow
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
$7.7M
$-25.9M
Q3 25
$4.8M
$2.6M
Q2 25
$5.2M
$3.4M
Q1 25
$-15.0M
$-49.5M
Q4 24
$8.5M
$-20.8M
Q3 24
$-21.2M
$14.1M
Q2 24
$-45.5M
$-13.2M
Q1 24
$-69.8M
$-32.3M
FCF Margin
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
3.6%
-11.4%
Q3 25
2.4%
1.3%
Q2 25
2.8%
2.1%
Q1 25
-8.9%
-32.7%
Q4 24
4.8%
-14.0%
Q3 24
-14.1%
10.3%
Q2 24
-31.3%
-10.8%
Q1 24
-50.4%
-27.1%
Capex Intensity
ATEC
ATEC
LMND
LMND
Q4 25
6.1%
4.1%
Q3 25
4.7%
1.0%
Q2 25
5.6%
1.3%
Q1 25
5.9%
1.5%
Q4 24
1.1%
6.3%
Q3 24
10.5%
1.6%
Q2 24
23.4%
1.2%
Q1 24
22.6%
2.1%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons